Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Friday, 7 August 2015

Gavin de Beer was wrong

Gavin de Beer
Sir Gavin de Beer (FRS) wrote in the Wilkins Lecture for the Royal Society (de Beer 1962 on page 333):

 "...William Charles Wells and Patrick Matthew were predecessors who had actually published the principle of natural selection in obscure places where their works remained completely unnoticed until Darwin and Wallace reawakened interest in the subject.'

 What the expert Royal Society member Sir Gavin Rylands de Beer, British evolutionary embryologist, Director of the British Museum (Natural History), President of the Linnean Society, and receiver of the Royal Society's Darwin Medal for his studies on evolution never knew - that I have uniquely discovered (see Nullius in Verba) - is that at least 25 people actually cited Matthew's (1831) book before Darwin's and Wallace's papers, which replicated Matthew's original ideas and explanatory examples, were read before the Linnean Society in 1858, seven of them were naturalists, four known to Darwin and two to Wallace. Royal Society Darwin Medal

 So where's my Darwin Medal for being proven a better scholar than de Beer on his own subject? Perhaps the Royal Society needs to improve the quality of its membership and medal winners? Linnean society too. The pseudo-scholarly Darwin glee-club shame of it!

 Visit PatrickMatthew.com to learn the truth about the discovery of natural selection.
Posted by at
Labels: , , ,

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous6 April 2016 at 09:04

    Yes, and I particularly like the measured, rational approach you show. No sensationalist wording unsupported by reliable evidence here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dysology23 April 2016 at 12:30

    Facts are facts. It is 100 per cent proven that the Royal Society Darwin medal winner de Beer (same as the Royal Society Darwin Medal winner Ernst Mayr) was completely wrong to write that the original ideas in Matthew's book went unread. No other Darwin scholar spotted thus. So where is my medal for spotting it and bursting the great myth?

    Here: http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

    ReplyDelete

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)