Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Thursday 29 February 2024

Tyranny of the Fraudulent Empirical Fact Denial Darwin Industry and Darwin Worshipping Superfans

Empirical facts are facts. They are intrinsic truth. And it is a truism that "truth is truth". Moreover, lies are lies and falsehood are not truth, they are the enemy of truth and the enemy of history and science.

If you want a veracious history of science then you need to stop being boring.

If you think the Darwin Industry, and its crumb from their table begging harassment toadies, are ethical, honest and reasonable people then you are mistaken.

You have to think and then act like an inventive and innovative originator if you wish to overcome the brute censorship of the empirical data in the story of Matthew v Darwin and Wallace.

Friday 9 February 2024

The Wikipedia Page on Patick Matthew


The Wikipedia page on Patrick Matthew has been substantially written by irrational fact denial Darwin superfans. These toxic spuriofact creation individuals have desperately sought to deny and delete facts and misrepresent unique research data by lies, other mischievous falsehoods, plagiarism and stalker malicious harassment behaviour. Wikipedia brute censorship of the classic and newly unearthed empirical data of what Matthew wrote, what Darwin replicated from Matthew's work and the proven lies Darwin wrote about who read Matthew's 1831 breakthrough before Darwin and Wallace (1858/59) replicated his 1831 breakthrough is a total fake-news long-running disgrace.