Agreed. Such as "Did Darwin and Wallace and all their fellow naturalists REALLY not read Matthew's prior published theory that Darwin and Wallace replicated along with Matthew's unique explanatory examples and terms - as Darwin claimed? And the answer = No. And Darwin also lied. https://t.co/fOpOQ8qjU5 pic.twitter.com/ai3nYOMMFP
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 27, 2020
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Showing posts with label Science of plagiary studies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science of plagiary studies. Show all posts
Thursday, 27 February 2020
On Darwin and Matthew: What is the question?
So what is the scientific question here?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)