Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Saturday, 28 May 2022

Science Fraud bombshell book hits the USA in June 2022



 If you live in the USA and are a science reporter or science reviewer and would like a complimentary copy for review purposes please make contact with the publisher Curtis Press - LinkedIn reviewer shout-out Here from Neil Shuttleworth of Curtis Press. Or visit the Curtis Press website to request a free review copy: https://curtis-press.com/ 





#patrickmatthew #curtispress #sciencefraud

Friday, 27 May 2022

Dr Mike Sutton's Academic Influence

 What a difference a science book makes. I am now, according to one major algorithm (give or take three hundred or so) the 31,000th most influential person on planet Earth - of all time.

 Here: https://academicinfluence.com/people/mike-sutton-1 (archived here: https://archive.ph/JioFW)


In 2013/14, I made the history of science and criminological discovery of a lifetime. That bombshell discovery was made with the BigData IDD method (Sutton and Griffiths 2018). Today, you can read about it in my latest book: "Science Fraud: Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory" (Curtis Press) Here: Amazon books or direct from the science publisher Curtis Press: here

It has been said that when history deals you a card it outlines your destiny

History dealt me a card  back in 2013 when I first used Big Data analysis to originally and uniquely prove, contrary to what we have all been told we must believe, that Patrick Matthew's (1831) bombshell breakthrough of the origination of the theory of macroevolution by the natural process of selection in fact was read by other naturalists before Darwin and Wallace (in 1858) and Darwin (1859) replicated it and then called it their own theory. Moreover, those naturalists who I discovered did read and then cite Matthew's 1832 book in the published literature record were acknowledged influencers of Darwin and Wallace and of their influencer's influencers and all cited Matthew's book before 1858.

 Today I have it in my head that the world's greatest science fraud by plagiary and Charles Darwin are one and the same thing. My latest book (Sutton 2022) proves me right. 

History is on my side only because the newly unearthed and irrefutable empirical facts are on my side. Ultimately, the side of truth and veracity will always conquer the side of myths, lies and propaganda. 


Covered extensively in the press in 2022


1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archived)

In Press Reader  (archived)  

2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)

3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)

4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in full)

and here

5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)

6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)

7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022) 

8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)

9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)

10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)

11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)

12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)


Sunday, 1 May 2022

UK National and Regional Press Coverage of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Tgheory"

 Science Fraud in the press since published in the UK ans Europe in February 2022



1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archived)

In Press Reader  (archived)  

2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)

3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)

4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in full)

and here

5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)

6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)

7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022) 

8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)

9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)

10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)

11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)

12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)

Tuesday, 26 April 2022

Even in Democratic Societies We are not Immune from Establishment Lies and Propaganda



Are YOU immune to being credulously hoodwinked to ignore or hate facts so much you can't see them?

History will look back at us and laugh. But perhaps today we still time now to have the last laugh.

Do YOU know what time it is? 

Get the empirical facts before its too late for YOU

 https://thedailyjournalist.com/thethinker/even-in-democratic-societies-we-are-not-immune-from-establishment-lies-and-propaganda/



Thursday, 21 April 2022

Wikipedia Patrick Matthew Page is being Run by Putin Type Kremlin Type Propagandist Liars, Fact Denial, Empirical Data Brute Censors!

 If you take a visit to the Wikipedia Patrick Matthew page and if you can tell desperate nonsense put there by desperate Darwin worshippers to hide newly unearthed empirical data that proves Darwin lied and plagiarised the entire theory of macroevolution by natural selection, from empirical facts, why not spend time reading the newly unearthed empirical facts rationally and calmly explained. 

No wonder members of the desperate so-called "Darwin Industry" are running about like headless zombie chickens. Dr Mike Sutton's bombshell data has blown their little clucking heads clean off!

Brief outline of empirical facts, all rationally explained Here (archived for citation Here)

Zombie chicken Darwin propaganda guano on Wikipedia (archived on 21st April 2022 for future scholars to cite ) Here

Most of the Wikipedia propaganda about Patrick Matthew and its content that is seeking to refute empirical research into Darwin's plagiarism of Matthew's theory and associated lies is complete lies and misinformation that has been put there, or else contains the claptrap written by those who have not actually read the new data on Darwin's and Wallace's fraud, by those caught deleting the empirical facts on who actually did read and then cite Matthew's book and the theory in it pre-1831. 

The nasty empirical fact deleting propagandists include Wikipedia corrupt Darwin Industry support editor "Dave Souza" - fully outed having been caught out deleting new found empirical facts in an experiment (before he was finally forced to stop deleting them when his activities were recorded) and he is now named and shamed in "Science Fraud" with all the evidence archived).

The ludicrous efforts of  Dr Dagg and Dr Mike Weale are also on the Wikipedia Patrick Matthew page. Both of these men maliciously plagiarised Dr Sutton's original prior published Selby data in papers they had published in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Both Weale and Dagg are now named and shamed for posterity for that behaviour and, in Weale's case far worse besides, in "Science Fraud".) All such behaviour of theirs is fully evidenced as malicious activities and is cited to fully archived sources in "Science Fraud".

The malicious obsessive lies and harassment activities of  Dr Julian Derry are all over that Patrick Matthew Wikipedia page. This vile and Darwin obsessed individual has committed dozens of acts of nasty criminal harassment via poison pen emails etc and even sent the author of Science Fraud a vile obscene anal rape tweet. Dr Julian Derry's vile obscene and harassment behaviour is fully recorded and also fully archived and referenced. He is named and shamed and fully referenced to archive sources in "Science Fraud".

Science fraud, the bombshell 2022 book is available from all good book shops and on Amazon: HERE Or direct form the science publisher Curtis Press HERE

No wonder Wikipedia is the world's worst encyclopedia. The shame of it is now published and will be read about for centuries to come.


This blog post is archived for scholarly citation. https://archive.ph/K5uyS


Monday, 18 April 2022

Could you be hoodwinked by state propaganda? If you live in the West, you already are.

 Is anyone immune to being misled by state and institutional propaganda? Are you?



Wednesday, 13 April 2022

World Influencers: How can we close the "influencer gap" on liars, monsters, plagiarists and their facilitators, pseudo scholars and empirical fact deniers?

 Dr Mike Sutton v who? Patrick Matthew v who? And what about you v who? How do you do?


Search on World Influencer rankings since 1800 Here (archived Here)

(NOTE: All rankings in this blog post are for 2022)
 
Are you on the list of the most influential? Are you ranked as a world influencer? How do your heroes or those you despise rank? 




Patrick Matthew is 100% proven to have influenced Charles Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's influencers and is proven beyond all reasonable doubt to have influenced by Darwin and Wallace to plagiarise his prior published theory of the "natural process of selection." The reason he is not ranked in the top 20 influencers all time in the world is simply because of Darwin's and Wallace's science fraud by plagiary and then their serial lies, and the falsehoods told by their adoring pseudo-scholarly fans, about Matthew and his (1831) book and who read it before they copied the theory (and much more besides) from it and then lied by calling it their own. Get the fact HERE




Darwin's World and Academic Influence (archived at April 2022)








Thursday, 7 April 2022

Scientists, stop parroting myths!

 

Tuesday, 5 April 2022

Ahhh Coincidence! Darwin's stolen notebooks are mysteriously returned.

 All good fun.