Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Wednesday, 13 October 2021

New Zealand Journal Citation of Matthew's On Naval Timber

 Another citation of  Patrick Matthew's book On Naval Timber and Arboriculture (1831), by someone writing as "W. on August 19th on page 221 of the New Zealand Journal 1843.

 Found using IDD. Here. Archived: 

Tuesday, 12 October 2021

Patrick Matthew was a Chartist Leader

 The Chartist Regional Leader, Patrick Matthew was a delegate of the 1839 General Convention of the Industrious Classes elected by the "Radical Reformers of Great Britain" - for enactment of The People's Charter.

See the proof: (here).

The privileged landowning classes, including Charles Darwin and many other naturalists feared the Chartists

In this book you see Matthew named as a delegate alongside other famous electoral reform leaders in 1839 such as William Lovett, Henry Vincent, Fergus O'Conner, John Collins and John Frost, 

More on Chartism here

Sunday, 5 September 2021

The Victorian Establishment Crucified Matthew for Being a God Mocking Heretic

Get the verifiable facts at

Monday, 2 August 2021

Opportunistic Traitor

 Charles Darwin's newly proven plagiarism shows he was not a hero at all but nothing more than an opportunistic traitor to science.

Facts: Here in 800 words.

Saturday, 24 July 2021

Sounds Like Matthew: A Memoir

On the alternate reality fake news of the Darwin Industry .

Friday, 23 July 2021

Are Darwinists becoming more pseudo-scientific than creationists? Telling question from an atheist.

 Everything is in Flux, Including Darwinists and the Darwin Industry Propaganda Shock Troops 


Thursday, 15 July 2021

Weird fixed-grin Darwin worshippers are part of a fact denial cult


Wednesday, 14 July 2021

Another article on plagiarism plagiarises my original research data

 Oh the triple irony!



Yes Darwin did Plagiarise Matthew but in a creationist article on that topic Dominic Stratham most ironically steals some of my primary research data on who was first to be second with apparently unique Matthewisms and who cited Matthew's NTA pre 1858  (e.g.  Low, Selby and Johnson) by failing to cite me as discoverer of those newly unearthed facts. Stratham even plagiarizes my discovery that NTA was advertised in the 1842 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. In his plagiarism of my original research findings, Stratham passes my (2014) original research data off as his own discovery or else something commonly known. It is neither!  It is not enough that Dominic Stratham cites my book, and cites me as the discoverer of other data he uses, if he then fails to cite me as the discoverer of  other newly unearthed data he replicates!  Stratham, who at least knows what sound evidence is certainly no worse as a plagiarist than arch Darwin industry nominals Joachim Dagg and the malicious workplace harasser Dr Mike Weale in plagiarising from my original data findings first published in Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret (Sutton 2014) Strathams article is a pdf File - click  here

Dagg and Weale have each plagiarised my Selby cited Matthew data (facts here) . They each did so in desperate separate articles in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, which is with triple irony the same journal by descent in which Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Matthew in 1858. How thick are these plagiarists? 

Maybe  Weale, Dagg and Stratham will next publish a joint article together in either the disgraceful pseudo-scholarly, plagiarist facilitating, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society or in the Journal of Creation and plagiarise even more of my research and do so in an article about Darwin's plagiarism? How ironic would that be?

. . .