Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Monday, 3 February 2025

Connections between Donald Trump and Charles Darwin: An explanation by way of analogies

 
Stupid is Stupid Does: Charles Darwin was the World's Greatest Con Man

Patrick Matthew (1831) used an analogy of differences between artificial selection and natural selection as a key explanatory device for the first published origination of the complete theory of macro-evolution by the natural process of selection. That was so important, the plagiarist Charles Darwin replicated it at the very start of  his theory stealing book The Origin of Species (1859).

Furthermore, as it has long been said that "An artist borrows but a great artist steals" if that reasoning is to be followed then Darwin was a great con artist because he is 100% proven to have knowingly lied when he wrote that no single person had read Matthew's 1831 book before he and Wallace replicated the bombshell theory in it. and claimed to have done so independently of Matthew's influence. 

Analogously, Donald Trump's two times election as US President  is proof enough of the saying that  "A conman does not have to be smart if his victims are stupid." In light of the empirical fact dodging (and so effectively) "fake" book reviews of Science Fraud, and blog, Wikipedia and academic biology journal shenanigans going on by fact denial Darwin fanatics (see a real science book chapter exposing this behaviour here archived here) those still believing in and promoting the Victorian Darwin Myth are stupid too. And so we see, yet again, that it's true: "stupid is stupid does".



Tuesday, 14 January 2025

Darwinism Holidaying from Proper history is Over: Proper history about independently verifiable facts, not about lies and using them to manipulate others

 Patrick Matthew originated and then had published the first full explanation of macro evolution by the process of natural selection in his book "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture" (1831) and followed it up with his second book "Emigration Fields" (1839) in order to make the case for conquest and Anglo Saxon colonization of other people's lands by what he thought represented the best genetic and moral variety of human beings. Later Matthew would write to Darwin a confession of his selfishness and repentance for so doing. However, Darwin the  plagiarist, serial liar and apex propagandist, who stole Matthew's theory, did no such thing. His sole aim was personal fame and he manipulated others to assist him in that endeavor by lying about Matthew's (1831) book and who he knew read it before he and Wallace copied the bombshell ideas in it and then claimed to have originated them independently of Matthew's prior publications.


I don't full agree with Marx's quote above, that I edited with the text "[Proper]".

 In my more considered opinion: 

"Proper history is not the same as any individual manipulating, exploiting the vulnerable and otherwise using people to achieve their own ends for propaganda and myth making. Proper history results from accurately data gathering, recording and objectively chronicling the actions of people and their various results, impacts and influence on the social and physical world."

In light of the new data that busts the Darwin and Wallace myth, it is time for proper historians of science (not Darwin super fans) to declare that the Darwin worshiping fanatical holiday from empirical data facts is over.