Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Saturday, 28 May 2022

Science Fraud bombshell book hits the USA in June 2022



 If you live in the USA and are a science reporter or science reviewer and would like a complimentary copy for review purposes please make contact with the publisher Curtis Press - LinkedIn reviewer shout-out Here from Neil Shuttleworth of Curtis Press. Or visit the Curtis Press website to request a free review copy: https://curtis-press.com/ 





#patrickmatthew #curtispress #sciencefraud

Friday, 27 May 2022

Dr Mike Sutton's Academic Influence

 What a difference a science book makes. I am now, according to one major algorithm (give or take three hundred or so) the 31,000th most influential person on planet Earth - of all time.

 Here: https://academicinfluence.com/people/mike-sutton-1 (archived here: https://archive.ph/JioFW)


In 2013/14, I made the history of science and criminological discovery of a lifetime. That bombshell discovery was made with the BigData IDD method (Sutton and Griffiths 2018). Today, you can read about it in my latest book: "Science Fraud: Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory" (Curtis Press) Here: Amazon books or direct from the science publisher Curtis Press: here

It has been said that when history deals you a card it outlines your destiny

History dealt me a card  back in 2013 when I first used Big Data analysis to originally and uniquely prove, contrary to what we have all been told we must believe, that Patrick Matthew's (1831) bombshell breakthrough of the origination of the theory of macroevolution by the natural process of selection in fact was read by other naturalists before Darwin and Wallace (in 1858) and Darwin (1859) replicated it and then called it their own theory. Moreover, those naturalists who I discovered did read and then cite Matthew's 1832 book in the published literature record were acknowledged influencers of Darwin and Wallace and of their influencer's influencers and all cited Matthew's book before 1858.

 Today I have it in my head that the world's greatest science fraud by plagiary and Charles Darwin are one and the same thing. My latest book (Sutton 2022) proves me right. 

History is on my side only because the newly unearthed and irrefutable empirical facts are on my side. Ultimately, the side of truth and veracity will always conquer the side of myths, lies and propaganda. 


Covered extensively in the press in 2022


1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archived)

In Press Reader  (archived)  

2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)

3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)

4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in full)

and here

5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)

6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)

7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022) 

8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)

9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)

10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)

11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)

12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)


Sunday, 1 May 2022

UK National and Regional Press Coverage of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Tgheory"

 Science Fraud in the press since published in the UK ans Europe in February 2022



1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archived)

In Press Reader  (archived)  

2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)

3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)

4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in full)

and here

5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)

6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)

7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022) 

8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)

9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)

10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)

11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)

12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)