On the growing accpetance of the new data that proves Charles Darwin committed plagirising, lying science fraud by glory theft @DrMarkGriffiths Thanks Mark: https://t.co/tw4Qj1RNqB— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 13, 2018
The above article is here and archived here
What many may be outraged to learn is that Darwin blatantly lied in 1860, in a letter to the famous French naturalist, and then in the third edition of the Origin of Species, when he wrote that no other naturalist / no one whatsoever read Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published full theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Because Matthew had informed him in 1860 that the very opposite was true. Moreover, the newly discovered (by me) data reveals that – contrary to the “no one read Matthew" myth parroted by endless Darwin scholars since Darwin started it as a lie - seven naturists in fact cited Matthew’s (1831) book pre-1858 Darwin and Wallace.
There is much more. And before some frothing at the mouth barking mad Cult of Darwin troll jumps in to claim otherwise here I am not a creationist I am an atheist and I think evolution by natural selection is a brilliant theory. But it’s not Darwin’s – or Wallace’s - and all the independently verifiable new evidence suggests Darwin plagiarised pre-1858 it as well as proves absolutely that he was a blatant plagiarising liar by glory theft.
Knowledge improves with more
knowledge. I found the hidden books that overturn the Darwin myth. Darwin used
to be my hero too. But the newly discovered facts disabused me.
