+Knowing the stresses faced by academics in the modern #ToxicUniversity, those with commercial & ideological interests to bury the verifiable scientific facts he revealed went after him at his place of work intimidating his managers. They succeeded in making him ill. @lizmorrish pic.twitter.com/TzmzsXaHCH— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) June 15, 2018
I HAVE A SIMILAR STORY OF NASTY, MALICIOUS VENDETTA HARASSING AND INTIMIDATION OF UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND TOP PROFESSORS TO TELL AND I WILL BE TELLING IT ALL IN DECEMBER 2018 (SEE DETAILS)
+One of these nasty #stalker #trolls severely intimidates one of my PhD students, @TeessideSitP another tries to have me fired for discovering disruptiv new data, then their 3rd associate plagiarizes my discovery and publishes it in Linnean Journal! https://t.co/T8aN5JhTyW pic.twitter.com/DHQVxWPhzQ— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) June 9, 2018
+The issues at stake - notably academic freedom - is something Laurie Taylor is interested in @JayneEEgerton The story has many dimension but the institutional backdrop should interest all academics that care about academic integrity as much as @Criminotweet does— Andy Wilson (@a8drewson) June 7, 2018
+Never mess with a former Home Office Senior Research officer trained for years in PR to deal patiently with intimidation and harassment.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 9, 2018
Just for starters, my story is now to be included as a published case study in the field of #CriticalUniversityStudies https://t.co/rHHqQjVzx9 pic.twitter.com/iMhrx6ejPd
+In December 2018 I will be publicly shaming the recent plagiarism and pseudo scholarly Wikipedia bragging about the plagiarism of my discovery about Selby having read and cited Matthew. The #LinneanJournalScandal : https://t.co/rHHqQjVzx9— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 11, 2018
+#CriticalUniversityStudies: "...dedication to truth, fair play, and reasonable debate, of freedom of thought, ... that is now being cavalierly dismantled by people who do not have the wit to understand its meaning or significance for our civilization." https://t.co/DzE0sHxd9A!— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 12, 2018
+#Wikipedia editors make stuff up. This is supposed to be about me. But they just made some of it up. Why? Wikipedia is hilarious. Yet you still get people who believe what it publishes. Why? No better than the Sunday Sport. Probably far less factual. https://t.co/KsvUzUkwDR pic.twitter.com/pGsX3MHZeU— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 19, 2017
They believe (by denying the facts of the New Data) that Darwin and Wallace had immaculate independent conceptions of the very theory their friends, influencers and influencer's influencers read and then cited before Darwin and Wallace replicated it and claimed it as their own pic.twitter.com/jXGOMHurY9— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) June 13, 2018
