Anyone who has actually read the book "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" will know exactly how desperately pseudo scholarly some fake book reviews of it are. These fake reviews side-step (do not mention at all) the most important explanations about the data in the book and in so doing they deliberately set out to mischievously misrepresent what is written to explain the context of the data. Moreover, they purposely fail to mention the most important new data discovered in order to misrepresent the book in a most seemingly deliberate attempt that people will not read the book and learn the truth about Darwin's and Wallace's deliberate plagiarism of Patrick Matthew.
Should we expect more of dysological Darwin Super-fans and their facilitators and enablers?
Science and the history of science will judge such desperation and hold the perpetrators up for eternal ridicule as a warning to others not to deny facts in order to promote a weird agenda driven pseudo history of science and discovery.
You have to laugh.
