Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Thursday 31 December 2020

Don't be Credulous: Beware of mere appeals to dunderheaded authority

 Always think "Nullius in Verba"


Tuesday 29 December 2020

The Review of On Naval Timber in the Quarterly review 1831

 Get the facts on what was written in the 1831 Quarterly Review on the book that originated the first complete theory of evolution by natural selection Here 

Note what is contained in the review below is a necessarily cryptic reference to the sedition Matthew wrote on artificial and natural selection of human beings by way of the aristocracy and royalty not breeding with the best of the wider human race.


Wednesday 23 December 2020

The Stone of Scone (Stone of Destiny) Returns to Scone Palace

 It's coming home, it's coming home, the Stone of Scone is coming home!



Sunday 20 December 2020

Blind Belief of Darwin Fanatics

 Sometimes believing is just believing

Sunday 13 December 2020

The Darwin Legacy of Fake Facts

Get the facts on Darwin's great science fraud by glory theft, serial lying and plagiarism



Wednesday 9 December 2020

Charles Darwin. Why is he the most influential person in the entire history of the world? Ask the 96 thousandth 853rd most influential.


Darwin is ranked the most influential influencer of all time. But why? .



Saturday 5 December 2020

Misrepresentation of fact

 Great is the power of the pathological serial liar

Thursday 3 December 2020

Quotes and Sayings on Charles Darwin's Plagiarism

 The cat is out of the bag on Darwin's proven plagiarism of the entire theory of evolution by natural selection  and there is no getting it back in


Wednesday 2 December 2020

TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? Thierry Hoquet or True Concept but four-word shuffled plagiarised term?

To me, it looks on the face of it that a pertinent chapter (at least on the obvious issue of Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism) is to be found in TRANSLATING NATURAL SELECTION: TRUE CONCEPT, BUT FALSE TERM? by Thierry Hoquet pp. 67-96 2013). What is interesting is that in this publication Hoquet cites Matthew's original, and prior to Darwin's and Wallace's supposedly miraculous independent 1858 replication of Matthew's theory, coinage of the term "natural process of selection". Hoquet notes Darwin (1859) wrote 'process of natural selection' in his book The Origin of Species, but that  four-word shuffling of Matthew's term does not appear to interest him. 

Those questioning whether or not Darwin plagiarized Matthew, are of course alerted to the fact ignored by Hoquet that Darwin has originally four-word shuffled Matthew's original phrase into his own regeneration of it.

 In my book (Sutton 2017), I point out why a plagiarist of  Matthew's theory of evolution by natural selection would risk such a thing. My own guessed reason for that is because Darwin had no choice, because the theory is about (1) "selection" that is (2)"natural" (as opposed to artificial) and is a (3) "process".  Therefore, Darwin would have felt he had no choice but to regenerate by four-word shuffling Matthew's original term for the concept he plagiarized from him, otherwise Matthew's theory could not be explained as well as the originator explained it before Darwin stole it. 

NOTE: I am most grateful to Hugh Dower for for sharing the pdf containing Hoquet's publication.