Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Showing posts with label dog fox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dog fox. Show all posts

Friday 27 September 2024

Not so much a "missing link" as a new one?

 

Not so much a "missing link" as a new one?

Might a perversion or paraphilia yet overturn the notion of species?

There is an interesting "link" (no pun intended) between the work I have published on Charles Darwin's plagiarism of theory of evolution by natural selection and the book I edited on perversions and paraphilias.

Although I have published books ( Curtis Press ), a book chapter and several peer reviewed academic articles on Darwin's science fraud by plagiarism, I am not qualified enough to know how good a theory natural selection is for explaining the origin of new species. I am, of course, aware of the argument that it takes so long to branch from a common ancestor that absence of evidence of it actually happening is not evidence of absence it happened and happens. But what of two species that were said to have branched from a common ancestor and (so being separate species) cannot mate with one another? You know like chimpanzees and humans.

Professor Mark Griffiths informed me of the recent claim that the first progeny of a fox and dog has been discovered: Shelter Rescues Injured Animal—Turns Out To Be World's First Dog-Fox Hybrid - See https://theconversation.com/the-first-dog-fox-hybrid-points-to-the-growing-risk-to-wild-animals-of-domestic-species-213616

As Editor of Professor Griffith's forthcoming book (1st Nov 2024) on Perversions and Paraphilias it made me think of this story in the news: (Perversions and Parahilias link here https://curtis-press.com/product/sexual-perversions-and-paraphilias-an-a-to-z/

Might humans then one day also possibly produce progeny with a chimpanzee?  From a perverted "love" relationship (see the news story)

What would the Darwin worshiping empirical fact denial zombie horde have to say about that one I wonder. Of course, the claimed fox-dog "discovery" might yet be debunked. And we do know that the fox in question was a pampas fox. Can a pampas fox breed with a red fox and the progeny from that breed with a dog? I don't know. Does anyone? Time will tell. Facts always burrow to the top in the end.