This terrible: Darwin is a proven liar and plagiarist

According to all definitions of the word, and as supported by the independently verifiable facts of the historic publication record (newly unearthed with #BigData technology), Charles #Darwin was a plagiarist. Perhaps the worst plagiarist in the history of scientific discovery. pic.twitter.com/ilH8LsiNeM

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 10, 2018

Did Darwin do it? The unwelcome facts prove he did

Yes he did

1. https://t.co/E3VAVV2LYC
The independently verifiable peer reviewed proof
2. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL
3.https://t.co/SXiHqXQlsx

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 4, 2017

+

Award winning NTU values Ideas - but newly discovered and significant independently verifiable facts even more so.https://t.co/ZnT8n4muOP pic.twitter.com/lJ74FknPiq

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 4, 2017

+

History is being rewritten by newly discovered facts. Of course the feathers of minor birds and parrots are ruffled. https://t.co/FT675ucx5z

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) October 4, 2017

Darwin Lied

https://t.co/6JQXBT0hko pic.twitter.com/qzxSF0IKTz

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) December 3, 2016

Darwin (1861) Lied When he Wrote in The Origin of Species (third edition) that Matthew's original Ideas went Unread

Even after Patrick Matthew (1860) told Charles Darwin about the naturalist Loudon and another, unnamed, who read his original ideas before 1860, Darwin continued with his lie that Matthew's prior-published discovery of natural selection went unread until Matthew brought it to darwin's own attention in 1860,