Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Monday 25 February 2019

How does the world really work versus knowledge gap filling mythology


Friday 22 February 2019

Wallace the fraudster

Wallace never discovered that bee at all. A local took it to show him! Here

Friday 15 February 2019

Something wrotten about some scientists

Wednesday 13 February 2019

Credulous Darwin Worshipper Cult

If you ever thought it was an exaggeration that there is a credulous, ignorant of the facts, Darwin worship cult, here is some up-to-date confirmatory evidence for its existence


Monday 11 February 2019

Darwin needs removing from lists of great scientists and putting on lists of great plagiarisers


Darwin now needs putting on a list of great plagiarising science fraudsters


Sunday 10 February 2019

Thursday 7 February 2019

The Linnean Society and its Shameful Role in Supporting Plagiary

Wednesday 6 February 2019

Darwin was fooled by total quackery and Wallace was a total idiot too: But we don't have to be

Mind you, Darwin and Wallace worshippers are as bad. They credulously believe in Darwin's and Wallace's claims to have miraculously conceived Patrick Matthew's prior published theory (Darwin from the literature and Wallace from the first and only claimed case of malarial fever cognitive enhancement) after their friends and influencers and influencer's influencers cited Matthew's book and the bombshell theory in it:

Sunday 3 February 2019

Matthew the Botanist

In 1850 the famous naturalist and publisher John Loudon listed Patrick Matthew (here) as an acknowledged botanist.

After Darwin and Wallace plagiarised his work, Matthew was also listed as a noted botanist in the 1881 Jackson's Guide to the Literature of Botany (here) and again (noting that "Jacks" reference) as a noted botanist here on page 116 of than 1898 Biographical Index of British and Irish Botanists, in which the authors of that guide write in its preface that they excluded inclusion of obscure or trivial writers on the topic).

In order to get away with plagiarising Matthew's prior published theory of evolution by natural slection, the proven serial liar and plagiarist Charles Darwin, however, slyly portrayed Matthew as an obscure Scottish writer on forest trees. Despite the ridiculous myth perpetuated by cult-like credulous Darwin worshipers, the reality is that  Matthew enjoyed an international reputation as a noted botanist and expert on the topic of hybridizing and cultivating fruit trees.