Research Ethics and Charles Darwin

Charles Darwin had few ethics. He was a serial liar and a plagiarizing glory thief. as was Alfred Wallace. Darwin worship cultists cannot re-bury these verifiable facts in the new millennium,

This is what science is supposed to look like. Namely, when their earlier thoughts and subsequent conclusions are dis-confirmed proper scientists change their minds accordingly. Unlike Darwin cultists who seek to bury the painful facts under a stinking pile of their constant lies, harassment and laughable Darwin superfan claptrap.

The plagiarizing and serial lying sly #toff Charles Darwin #spaffed his immortal reputation up the wall when he plagiarized Patrick Matthew's prior published theory.

The slyly buried facts have an uncomfortable habit of burrowing to the top in the end. https://t.co/dVBH17Mb0Z pic.twitter.com/MmaSBxZLUs

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 2, 2020

. Thank you Professor Palmer

Facts always burrow to the top in the end. Darwin worshipers are worse than religious nutters in their hatred of facts that prove they are a demented belief cult.

Check out the words of a proper critical thinking scientist on Darwin's proven plagiarism: https://t.co/6HDmlQBoDf pic.twitter.com/cWe5evRrvS

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 2, 2020

.

Interpreted by: Ray Charles Darwin

— Emilio Cervantes (@BiologiaPensamt) January 2, 2020

.

in 2020 more and more academics admit the fact that Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace have been proven to be serial lying, glory thieving science fraudsters by plagiarism. This will exponentially increase. Few people will shout out a painful truth alone. https://t.co/YSJDLfVMRS pic.twitter.com/yB4RT7IROk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 2, 2020