Science Fraud, the book, is now available also on Kindle.
In The UK (here)
In the USA (here)
And on all other Amazon sites worldwide.
Now you can take a peek inside. 😎.
The story of the World's greatest science fraud. The case of Matthew v Darwin is now available on Kindle from Amazon. So now you can have a peek for free. https://t.co/wwstrGidz1 pic.twitter.com/uWTnTSqpFd
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 15, 2023
Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory is now available as a download ebook at:https://t.co/50ZanjIpBG#patrickmatthew #sciencefraud #darwin #scienceplagiarism #charlesdarwin
— Neil Shuttlewood, publisher at Curtis Press (@CurtisPress_) February 5, 2023
Here is the article by "Dagg the Plagiarist" that slyly plagiarizes Sutton's Selby cited Matthew discovery. It sidesteps all the main New Data findings to try to argue Darwin was not a plagiarist. Disgrace to science! @LinneanSociety should be ashamed: https://t.co/Q6Colo3Oz8 https://t.co/naTZm3oxah pic.twitter.com/hll7Pzcb85
— BentSociety @The Veracity Institute (@OnNavalTimber) February 14, 2020
The Selby (Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper journal Chief Editor and friend of Darwin's great friend Leonard Jenyns) cited Matthew's (1831) original theory of evolution by natural selection was not discovered first by Dagg, nor anyone else before Sutton uniquely unearthed it from the historic publication record with his BigData IDD method in 2013/14.
Sutton's Selby cited Matthew unique discovery was first published by Sutton in 2014 In the 500 page E-book Nullius in Verba (Thinker Media) - "Dagg the Plagiarist" wrote a childishly jealous malicious pseudo-scholarly review of the 2017 book Nulius in Verba archived here and admits to reading Sutton's 2014 book here
In two peer reviewed academic articles Sutton's original research discovery of the Selby cited Matthew original finding was published here in 2014 and here in 2015
Here is the concrete empirical data scientific evidence of Joahochim Dagg's knowing malicious plagiarism of research data first unearthed by Dr Mike Sutton and published by Thinker Media in 2014, Vae Victus (2017) and Curtis Press (2022) and various peer reviewed academic articles in between and Dagg's clear pseudo scientific weird gloating refusal to admit such original and paradigm changing research findings plagiarism is wrong. Image below can be seen on Dagg's Twitter account archived,
Clearly Darwin Superfans (and Dagg is just one of many of them) cannot behave like proper academic scholars and scientists or historians of science - so mentally disturbed are they by the new empirical data that bursts their beloved paradigm based on the now completely debunked Darwin Supermyth. Theirs is a credulously unshakable blind belief and empirical fact denial "religious" worship of Charles Darwin. This explains their malicious anti-science behavior.
