The article by "Dagg the Plagiarist" that slyly plagiarizes Sutton's Selby cited Matthew discovery, deliberately sidesteps all the main New Data findings to try to argue Darwin was not a plagiarist. Disgrace to science, but it's not science anyway, because its post-truth fact denial Putinesque, Trumpesque, Borisesque utter delusional claptrap.
Read the propaganda nonsense here and decide for yourself if you are in possession of the New Data Dagg slyly ignores HERE
You can get all the new data HERE - and also read more about Dagg's plagiarism and the dysology of the Linnean Society Darwin worship cult.
