Google A.I is Reducing Google Functionality

A.I has now lost even more of Google's earlier ability to find hidden texts in historic public record. Unless you know reference it no longer detects anything that forms the new uncovered references data in the Matthew, Darwin & Wallace Plagiarism Scandal https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 8, 2018

Some peer reviewed papers on the scandal and what I uniquely found with the IDD method

1. http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf

2. http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

+

As a criminologist, I am rather surprised my research into illicit markets for stolen goods & stolen ideas would lead to a discovery that apparently confirms fears #ArtificialIntelligence (#AI) poses big problems for important human knowledge progression https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE pic.twitter.com/myqEDzSpbt

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 8, 2018

THANK YOU GOOGLE FOR: The Big Data-IDD Bombshell Detection Research Method

ONE MORE STEP FORWARD FOR ALL THE VERACITY SEEKERS:
Nullius-Verba-Darwins-Greatest-Secret-ebook

If you agree with any of the following three statements then PatrickMatthew.com is probably not for you

1. I am not at all interested in learning that there are irrefutable facts that newly prove Charles Darwin was a liar who wrote the exact opposite to what he had been informed was the truth about who he knew who cited Patrick Matthew's book and the original ideas in it, which he claimed to have discovered independently of Matthew, before he replicated those ideas and then excused himself for doing so by writing self-serving lies that those original ideas in Matthew's book were unread by any naturalists and unread by anyone. [Agree] [Disagree]
2. I am not interested in any evidence that denigrates the great original genius thinker Charles Darwin, and some of the most revered scientists in the world who credulously parroted his lies because I would rather have the romance and the lies. [Agree] [Disagree]
3. It does not matter what has been newly proven about the probable influence of Matthew's original thinking on Darwin and Alfred Wallace, because all that matters is the ideas and who convinced the wider world of their importance. [Agree] [Disagree]

If you disagreed with all of the above statements then you might care enough about veracity in the history of scientific discovery to proceed to read the following fully evidenced facts

1. Patrick Matthew was the only person to be first to discover the macro evolution process of natural selection as the answer to the origination and extinction of all species on Earth.(Evidence here   ).
2. Darwin was a self-serving serial liar who deliberately corrupted the history of discovery of natural selection. (Evidence here)
3. Leading evolutionary biologists parroted Darwin's lies, and by so doing facilitated a 'culture of concealment' of the evidence that proves Darwin and Wallace knew and were influenced directly by those who read - and then cited - Matthew's book, and the original ideas in it, before 1858. Moreover, Darwin's and Wallace's proven influencers also knew those who read and cited Matthew's original ideas before 1858. (Evidence here   ).

The Veracity Revolution >>Blame it on Google>> No. 1 in a shameless self-trumpeting campaign

Last year I cringed amidst a captive audience. The very well paid Vice Chancellor of a British university was lecturing us by braying-on about his profound 'expert' observations that in the library of his institution students were using computers to learn and were not just "playing-around on Google."

What that so called highly paid 'expert' leader in higher education clearly did not know is that playing around on Google allows students to do what could never otherwise be achieved in a thousand lifetimes, not by anyone .

I noted that the man was wearing grey shoes.  Grey shoes, I tell you!

Thanks to Google, it is possible to scan over 30 million publications in seconds to find exactly what you are looking for. Playing around on Google gets to the truth and busts pervasive myths. Playing around on Google enables students to discover that what is written inside many scholarly books is 100 per cent wrong! Because Playing around on Google allows everyone to veraciously challenge 'expert' knowledge-beliefs that have been surreptitiously stuffed into knowledge gaps.

Dysology.com and PatrickMatthew.comAttribution

Join the Veracity Revolution. Blame it on Google and Follow Supermythbuster on Twitter

Playing around on Google proved that Charles Darwin definitely did not independently discover natural selection, neither did the other pretender Alfred Wallace (see Sutton 2014). If that veracious discovery upsets you then you should blame it on Google. 

Playing around on Google enables us to discover the origins of discoveries, ideas, terms, phrases and concepts.

Dysology.orgAttribution

The Humpty Dumpty Myth is Busted

The origin of Humpty Dumpty is Punchinello (Sutton 2013)

For daily updates on the Veracity Revolution >>Blame it on Google>> campaign you could do worse than Follow me "Supermythbuster "on Twitter by clicking here.

Alternatively, you could wear grey shoes and try clicking your heels together in your comfy dotage. 

A crisis in the history of scientific discovery

Patrick Matthew.
The Biological Father
of Natural Selection

Progress in search engine technology facilitated research in Google's Library Project of over 30 million searchable books and other publications, which led to game changing discoveries that transform the unique anomaly of Darwin's and Wallace's claimed dual independent discoveries of Matthew's prior-published original ideas from a vexation into a crisis in the history of scientific discovery.

The issue of Patrick Mathew's priority over Darwin and Wallace for his own prior-published and cited discovery is not something that the history of scientific discovery can ethically or sensibly ignore if it is to be of any use in helping us to understand how the discovery of natural selection occurred. Such knowledge is important, because it is fundamental in developing ways to increase the chances of making other great discoveries in the future.

 See the home page of PatrickMatthew.com for more details