What a difference a science book makes. I am now, according to one major algorithm (give or take three hundred or so) the 31,000th most influential person on planet Earth - of all time.
Here: https://academicinfluence.com/people/mike-sutton-1 (archived here: https://archive.ph/JioFW)
In 2013/14, I made the history of science and criminological discovery of a lifetime. That bombshell discovery was made with the BigData IDD method (Sutton and Griffiths 2018). Today, you can read about it in my latest book: "Science Fraud: Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory" (Curtis Press) Here: Amazon books or direct from the science publisher Curtis Press: here
It has been said that when history deals you a card it outlines your destiny.
History dealt me a card back in 2013 when I first used Big Data analysis to originally and uniquely prove, contrary to what we have all been told we must believe, that Patrick Matthew's (1831) bombshell breakthrough of the origination of the theory of macroevolution by the natural process of selection in fact was read by other naturalists before Darwin and Wallace (in 1858) and Darwin (1859) replicated it and then called it their own theory. Moreover, those naturalists who I discovered did read and then cite Matthew's 1832 book in the published literature record were acknowledged influencers of Darwin and Wallace and of their influencer's influencers and all cited Matthew's book before 1858.
Today I have it in my head that the world's greatest science fraud by plagiary and Charles Darwin are one and the same thing. My latest book (Sutton 2022) proves me right.
History is on my side only because the newly unearthed and irrefutable empirical facts are on my side. Ultimately, the side of truth and veracity will always conquer the side of myths, lies and propaganda.
Covered extensively in the press in 2022
1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archived)
In Press Reader (archived)
2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)
3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)
4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in full)
and here
5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)
6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)
7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022)
8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)
9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)
10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)
11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)
12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)
Science Fraud in the press since published in the UK ans Europe in February 2022
1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archived)
In Press Reader (archived)
2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)
3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)
4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in full)
and here
5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)
6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)
7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022)
8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)
9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)
10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)
11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)
12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)
The World's Greatest Science Fraud and the Story of the Three Darwins to Matthew Letters
Get the facts and bin the Victorian claptrap: https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/perth-kinross/3229517/perthshire-farmers-pre-charles-darwin-ideas-were-suppressed-by-english-establishment-claims-biologist/
Are YOU immune to being credulously hoodwinked to ignore or hate facts so much you can't see them?
History will look back at us and laugh. But perhaps today we still time now to have the last laugh.
Do YOU know what time it is?
Get the empirical facts before its too late for YOU:
If you take a visit to the Wikipedia Patrick Matthew page and if you can tell desperate nonsense put there by desperate Darwin worshippers to hide newly unearthed empirical data that proves Darwin lied and plagiarised the entire theory of macroevolution by natural selection, from empirical facts, why not spend time reading the newly unearthed empirical facts rationally and calmly explained.
No wonder members of the desperate so-called "Darwin Industry" are running about like headless zombie chickens. Dr Mike Sutton's bombshell data has blown their little clucking heads clean off!
Brief outline of empirical facts, all rationally explained Here (archived for citation Here)
Zombie chicken Darwin propaganda guano on Wikipedia (archived on 21st April 2022 for future scholars to cite ) Here
Most of the Wikipedia propaganda about Patrick Matthew and its content that is seeking to refute empirical research into Darwin's plagiarism of Matthew's theory and associated lies is complete lies and misinformation that has been put there, or else contains the claptrap written by those who have not actually read the new data on Darwin's and Wallace's fraud, by those caught deleting the empirical facts on who actually did read and then cite Matthew's book and the theory in it pre-1831.
The nasty empirical fact deleting propagandists include Wikipedia corrupt Darwin Industry support editor "Dave Souza" - fully outed having been caught out deleting new found empirical facts in an experiment (before he was finally forced to stop deleting them when his activities were recorded) and he is now named and shamed in "Science Fraud" with all the evidence archived).
The ludicrous efforts of Dr Dagg and Dr Mike Weale are also on the Wikipedia Patrick Matthew page. Both of these men maliciously plagiarised Dr Sutton's original prior published Selby data in papers they had published in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Both Weale and Dagg are now named and shamed for posterity for that behaviour and, in Weale's case far worse besides, in "Science Fraud".) All such behaviour of theirs is fully evidenced as malicious activities and is cited to fully archived sources in "Science Fraud".
The malicious obsessive lies and harassment activities of Dr Julian Derry are all over that Patrick Matthew Wikipedia page. This vile and Darwin obsessed individual has committed dozens of acts of nasty criminal harassment via poison pen emails etc and even sent the author of Science Fraud a vile obscene anal rape tweet. Dr Julian Derry's vile obscene and harassment behaviour is fully recorded and also fully archived and referenced. He is named and shamed and fully referenced to archive sources in "Science Fraud".
Science fraud, the bombshell 2022 book is available from all good book shops and on Amazon: HERE Or direct form the science publisher Curtis Press HERE
No wonder Wikipedia is the world's worst encyclopedia. The shame of it is now published and will be read about for centuries to come.
This blog post is archived for scholarly citation. https://archive.ph/K5uyS
Is anyone immune to being misled by state and institutional propaganda? Are you?
Most people think they know they would never believe the kind of state propaganda that led #Germans to murder millions of Jews, #Chinese to murder millions & #Russians to murder millions. But they are wrong. They prove they are easily brainwashed. Even Western scientists, by lies pic.twitter.com/QWJrT5Zqih
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) April 18, 2022
One reason people think Darwin discovered evolution by natural selection is because the myth has been nailed to their brains by a flock of silly bot-parrots. @darwinsbulldog @cdarwin @uk_darwin @DarwinAwards @JoachimDagg @Bio_and_Philo @BiolJLinnSoc @DAILYSQUIB @CurtisPress_ https://t.co/2OxkFuQu8E
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) April 7, 2022
All good fun.
In the wake of nation press serialization of Dr Sutton's bombshell book on Darwin's plagiarism that mocks Darwinists with analogy between theft of Darwin's notebooks and theft of his own research data by Darwinists, Darwin's notebooks mysteriously returned https://t.co/i7ztiudy0Q
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) April 5, 2022
Sunday 3rd April 2022 we see thee fourth instalment of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" Here
Get the book at Amazon Here
Sunday 27 April The Scottish Sunday Express 3rd instalment of the serialisation of Science Fraud (the book).
Read it here.
What are you waiting for? This is an international disgrace. The so-called "Darwin Industry" has been profiteering of a massive lie since 1859!
The history of science and discovery is corrupted by fake facts.
Students must write the wrong answers to be marked right in their essays and exams. This is massively embarrassing.
Read the facts and then help to set the record straight.
Available on Amazon books: Here.
Sunday March 20 2022 saw the second part of the on-going serialisation of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" in the Scottish national press via the Scottish Sunday Express.
. .
The article can be read here.
.
.If you live in #Scotland you could do worse than buy the Scottish Sunday Express . The @CurtisPress_ science book that 100% proves Charles #Darwin committed the world's biggest science fraud by theft of an entire Scottish theory & lied is being serialized https://t.co/9CdwsGdpLI
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) March 26, 2022
Another #Scottish national press instalment of "Dr Sutton Presents" in condensed instalments of bombshell data findings that prove #CharlesDarwin was the world's biggest science fraudster by plagiarism of a prior published theory. This changes everything! https://t.co/utH4HGRNN9
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) March 26, 2022
Read the introduction in the Scottish Sunday Express: Here
Read the serialised, hugely truncated and specially edited for the Scottish Express Chapter 1 HERE
Buy "Science Fraud" Here on Amazon, from the Publisher Curtis Press Direct, or order from your local bookshop.
This blogpost of 14 March 2022 is archived HERE
On Matthew's (1831) apparently original phrase "mental of instinctive powers."
"Science Fraud" not only lists those who actually cited Matthew's 1831 book before 1858, it also lists (List 2) those who BigData research reveals were apparently first (after Matthew 1831) to go into print with apparently unique "Matthewisms". Being apparently "first to be second" with an apparently unique "Matthewism" they are said in short to be "F2B2".
Thomas Laycock is one of the names in my List 2. Not only does "Science Fraud" reveal his works on the theme of organic evolution, it also reveals who he associated with who were associates of Charles Darwin.
But today (11 March 2022) I discovered something more in my continued research into this area. Today, I found that without citing Matthew (1831) Laycock (1832) wrote extensively aping Matthew's work on his observations on the fact that trees that are artificially selected by humans are of inferior quality to those growing in the wild. Here.
This provides yet more confirmatory evidence to support the F2B2 hypothesis stated in Science Fraud, the book.
In my most recent book "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" there are many examples where those in List 2 are found to have been interested in the same lines of enquiry as Matthew, or to have later written about observations he first made, but without citing. Some were F2B2 and later in other publications they then actually cited Matthew's bombshell book "On Naval Timber". All before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's theory and claimed it as their own.
Schacter (2012) Provides further information about Laycock (who first introduced himself to me when I used the IDD method to see if anyone was F2B2 with Matthew's (1831) apparently original phrase "mental or instinctive powers"). Amazingly, although he wrote on Matthew's (1831) topic of organic evolution and used Matthew's apparently original term without citing him Schacter (p.115) reveals that Laycock wrote on the topic of instinct the same concept that Matthew had pioneered.
Method
Schacter's (2012) book "Forgotten Ideas, Neglected Pioneers: Richard Semon and the Story of Memory" was found simply by typing the following search term into Google's standard search page: "Laycock" "Matthew" "Naval Timber" as in the image below.
Next if we take the same three terms as above - in inverted commas exactly as above - but click for Google to search on books we find Schacter's earlier book also covered this topic. The image below reveals all.
Today (07 March 2022) The Daily Squib sets the record straight on the Charles - The Dirty Plagiarist -Darwin, the "Darwin Industry" and its enablers - such as the fact censoring and malicious disinformation spreading pseudo-scholars of Wikipedia. Here (archived here) .
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) March 7, 2022.
.Origin of the Theory of the Origin of Species Was Not the Origin of the Theory of the Origin of the Specieshttps://t.co/FIvSj5NlYy#charlesdarwin #science pic.twitter.com/bhuT7FrbB1
— Daily Squib News (@DAILYSQUIB) March 7, 2022
Origin of the Theory of the Origin of Species Was Not the Origin of the Theory of the Origin of the Specieshttps://t.co/FIvSj5NlYy#charlesdarwin #science pic.twitter.com/bhuT7FrbB1
— Daily Squib News (@DAILYSQUIB) March 7, 2022
.
. https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/56010861382336513?lang=en-GB .Conspiracy theorists are those who claim coverups whenever insufficient data exists to support what they're sure is true.
— Neil deGrasse Tyson (@neiltyson) April 7, 2011
This is completely unacceptable ... this fact denial approach to Matthew's theory of natural selection has been pushed for long enough by the likes of Wikipedia. https://t.co/9BwStVqZEj
— Neil Shuttlewood, publisher with Curtis Press (@CurtisPress_) February 19, 2022
😂 Is Amazon the beast? Is it Sutton? Or is it Darwin? Or Matthew? Or is it Wallace? In the name of God who the Hell is the Beast? Buy the book and read the shocking "revelations" in it to find out. Is this the "end of days" for Charles Darwin? 😈💀
Buy this bombshell book on Amazon for the price of the "mark of the beast" and exorcise - or else exercise, your demons now.
Someone using George Beccaloni's pseudonym Megaloblatta on February 16 2022 entered a link to typical Darwin fact hating superfan nonsense on the Wikipedia page for Patrick Matthew (relevant Wikipedia history page archived here.)
Beccaloni (claims to be employed by the "Darwin Trust") that appears to be true but he also pretends he is an objective scholar on the question of Matthew and Darwin. However, verifiable empirical evidence proves he is the opposite.
Facts about George Beccaloni and Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory
Firstly before commenting on my research into the story of Matthew, Darwin and Wallace George Becalloni dismissed it as untrue on a Richard Dawkins fans website and was caught in the act by Bob Butler my then publisher and CEO of Thinker Media. There, caught red handed Beccaloni was confronted by Butler and so was forced to admit he was commenting negatively on an academic book he had not even read. Therefore, anything Beccaloni writes about my research after that serious academic irregularity is worse than just tainted by his proven completely biased and desperate unprofessionally childish fact denial behaviour. It is contaminated by Beccaloni's proven prejudiced pseudoscientific thinking.
The 2022 post "Science Fraud" Darwinite fight-back against the facts is likely to ramp up over the coming months. Already George Beccaloni an employee of The Darwin Trust, no less, is getting published links on the Wikipedia page of Patrick Matthew to his ludicrous blog site. Wikipedia is not supposed to link to blog sites, under its own rules. But the Darwin horde is running the Patrick Matthew and Charles Darwin pages on Wikipedia, and one of them is proven by his own hand to be not only dishonest but employed by the Darwin Trust!
Megaloblatta publishing on Wikipedia on Beccaloni's recent published activity on to a blog post written by Beccaloni on his own site here
George Beccaloni caught red-handed dishonestly pretending - like any other desperate and panicking pseudoscientific fanatic does - to know the factual content of a book he had not even read here.
Beccaloni's subsequent blog on the topic he clearly proved himself untrustworthy to review. Here.
Why is this being added to Wikipedia today? Is it because Darwin superfans like Beccaloni, the world over, are in a fact denial panic about my new history of science book "Science Fraud" and the mass of press coverage it is receiving?
I geck them with empirical facts. They hate that, these fanatical members of the Darwinite Zombie Horde.
This page is archived for researchers, journalists and anyone else investigating the dishonesty at the core of the so-called "Darwin Industry" and its activities in publishing to promote falsehoods, mischievous misrepresentations of scholarly research and fact-denial censorship https://archive.is/QHr9H
Full conversation with Dr. Mike Sutton: https://t.co/XMc8ZwWNkP @CurtisPress_ @brandnewtube 25% off for our viewers. pic.twitter.com/ipa67upYEo
— Sonia Poulton (@SoniaPoulton) February 16, 2022
. .Both. Here is the English version. https://t.co/nBvSGRuJ0s pic.twitter.com/hUA6DETTdy
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 7, 2022
In the week leading up to Darwin Day 2022 Empirical research data proves once and for all that the genie is out of the bottle on Darwin's plagiarism, lies and glory thieving science fraud.
1. The English Mail on Sunday: Here . Archived Here
2. The Scottish Mail on Sunday
.
Just a few bombshell findings from the brand new #Curtis science book (Curtis Press) that blow to pieces the greatest myth and science fraud in the history of our planet! Credulous #DarwinDay organisers need their own #OperationLyingDog now @RichardDawkins @rdfrs @C_MAlexander pic.twitter.com/fl3dJt1VLD
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 6, 2022
3. Sputnick News. Archived HERE
4. Scottish Daily Express
.Headline news too right to story inside on #Science Fraud in the #Darwin Industry https://t.co/ku34b2bJz7 pic.twitter.com/ZA6AL5uKG7
— Fear and Loathing in Science (@Idk50074280) February 7, 2022
