Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism included replicating many highly unique explanatory examples Matthew provided in his book - such as the difference between trees selected by nature in the wild and those raised by artificial selection, the camouflage, speed quickness and cunning of animals selected by nature, the very essential words "natural process of selection" (slyly shuffled by Darwin to "natural process of selection", Matthew's grassy bank analogy, and many others. In that regard they stole not only his orignal scientific theory but also his orignal creativity in explaining it.#Meme: Darwin's & Wallace's amazing dual independent virgin conceptions of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory - Miraculous because we newly know their naturalist friends & influences & Wallace's Sarawak paper editor prior read & prior cited it. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL https://t.co/QJIXWVCYhv pic.twitter.com/QQbz77pXfv— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019
Stealing orignal ideas and creativity to get those ideas across, by not attributing their source, is the worst kind of plagiarism and fraud by glory theft of the work of another.
On plagiarism
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019
The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs