That explains why scientists simply cannot cope with the New #BigData discovery that Darwin and Wallace were lying plagiarizers of a prior published theory that their major influencers/friends had prior read and cited: https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 14, 2019
Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Showing posts with label Biased Darwinists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biased Darwinists. Show all posts
Friday, 14 June 2019
People have trouble accepting facts
Friday, 4 January 2019
Would someone calling themselves a Darwinist be best qualified to investigate and evaluate their beloved and cherished namesake's involvement in plagiarism and science fraud by glory theft?
+Experts in science fraud & lies told by scientists to steal the glory of others are the best equipped (not biased & silly, assumption making, 'Saint Darwin of the Immaculate Conception of a Prior Published Theory' worshipping cultists) to judge that topic https://t.co/uDWRdLPKJd pic.twitter.com/k4YLPE0yOX
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 4, 2019
Someone calling themsleves Trumpist is hardly best qualified to weigh evidence for his corruption. Similarly, someone calling themselves "Darwinist" or "Darwinite" is hardly best suited to investigate his science fraud. Leave it to expert social scientists https://t.co/uDWRdLPKJd pic.twitter.com/Y9FcSfpFOW
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) January 4, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)