Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Thursday, 6 October 2022

Undeclared Commercial Conflict of Interest?

 Dr Julian (J.F. ) Derry is the nasty anal rape tweeting harassing and obsessive malicious and obscene criminal stalker creature (here) who owns and runs and profits financially from the commercial "Darwin Monkey" (see proof its him )  business - selling Darwin Industry paraphernalia models / ornaments -  is publishing academic papers on Charles Darwin and so is surely (isn't he?) wrongly declaring no conflict of interest: e.g a most recent Royal Society paper

Surely that is against the rules? Isn't it? 

Here is as good a definition of what constitutes a commercial conflict of interest when it comes to academic papers as any: 

"A conflict of interest is a financial, intellectual relationship, personally owned and operated commercial business, or other  circumstances, that might affect, or reasonably be perceived by others to affect, an author’s judgment, conduct, or manuscript. When in doubt, disclose.More Here

How many other academic papers about Darwin, or at least once mentioning Darwin, has Julian Derry done this failure to disclose act on? The telling question is this: What would the journal editors do if they found out what he is up to? How can his articles be objective when he has an undeclared commercial business interest in selling Darwin ornaments that glorify Darwin? Should his Darwin superfan papers now be retracted? Some cases like this lead to exactly that outcome. See: