Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Showing posts with label humour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humour. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 June 2024

What counts as empirical data? A humorous heuristic device by way of analogy.

Has anyone experienced a radar storm in the UK in 2024? Has anyone spotted flying pig ice storms raining down from the clouds? Just asking, as I need to check my "smart TV" has not crossed into a slightly different not quite parallel universe. 😅

Empirical photograph evidence of a BBC claim that these occurrences happened, or else a BBC a typo, or a BBC A.I. error or someone at the BBC having a joke evidenced by these photographs of my TV  was broadcast in 2024. 

So, if you have the original publication that's empirical data that it was published in print. Similarly, if it happened in a broadcast and you capture that broadcast and don't alter  it then that's is also empirical data. And if it happened then it is history!

So here, by way of analogy, we can use humour as a heuristic device to mock the Darwin Deification Cult that fact denies what is in historic published print is actually there. They are fact denying our history.






Monday, 10 August 2015

Darwin Deifying Trolls Respond to the New Data with Obscene Language

Foul Trolls Serve as Volunteer Shock-Troops for the Darwin Industry

According to Kuhn (1970 p. 62) the characteristics of paradigm changing discoveries include the:

 '... previous awareness of an anomaly, the gradual and simultaneous emergence of both observational and conceptual recognition, and the consequent change of paradigm categories and procedures often accompanied by resistance.'

Challenged by the logical scholarly demands of the New Data presented on PatrickMatthew.com some upset Darwinists are getting themselves into a proper old lather in the 'resistance' to the newly discovered facts. Here is the fact-led challenge they hate:

How on Earth did Darwin and Wallace discover Natural Selection independently of Matthew's prior published hypothesis of it; despite the newly discovered fact that they were influenced and facilitated on the same topic by naturalists they knew who had long before read and cited Matthew's book, which contains it? Moreover, why did Darwin lie when, contrary to what Matthew informed him, he wrote that no naturalist had read Matthew's original ideas before 1860? Furthermore, why, after Matthew informed him a second time of yet another naturalist who read his original ideas, did Darwin continue his lie that no one read Matthew's ideas from the third edition of the Origin of Species onward?

In response to the New Data demands on biased brains, this typical Darwinist worshiping troll displays wonderful unintended comic humour "i" .  Now that's one for posterity. The abusive specimen resorted to a typical torrent of foul-penned misogynistic  ("c-"word) abuse. The example of his/her craft below is actually publishable and worth a laugh.


Darwin Deifying Atheist Trolls Hate the New Data on Darwin and Matthew.

For another interesting example of 'resistance' see this one from a named academic - Professor Comfort - who was obviously very upset by my fact-led peer reviewed academic journal paper on his hero's fraud (See Sutton 2014 The hi-tech detection of Darwin’s and Wallace’s possible science fraud: Big data criminology re-writes the history of contested discovery)