Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection
Showing posts with label Science Fraud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science Fraud. Show all posts

Monday 23 October 2023

The Patrick Matthew Effect in Science

 Read about "The ‘Patrick Matthew Effect’ in Science"

              By Dr Mike Sutton and Professor Mark Griffiths

Pages 213-229

In Academic Integrity in the Social Sciences: Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice. Published by Springer: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-43292-7


You may have heard of "The Matthew Effect in Science"  and so the "Patrick Matthew Effect" is incredibly important and ironic for those who have written about the Matthew Effect but are uninterested in Patrick Matthew precisely because of The Matthew Effect.

This chapter provides empirical archived evidence that Wikipedia is deliberately suppressing the facts about who did read and cite Matthew's 1831 book and the unique breakthrough in it before Darwin and Wallace replicated his unique breakthrough and lied that no one read (even after they were told it was read and cited). Moreover, it names two authors and the Darwin worshipping and his fraud enabling and facilitating  Biological Journal of the Linnean Society in which the facts are being further suppressed by their blind-sight of the new data and new pivoting ludicrous claims that Darwin could not have plagiarized or been influenced by Matthew. One of the named ludicrous Darwin worshipping authors very seriously and maliciously harassed the first author at his place of work (leading to a university investigation headed by a professor of law in which all the allegations were thrown out and branded childish, ridiculously disingenuous and very strange) and both those harassing fanatical authors are in a vindictive fact denial triangle of plagiarism and revenge harassment behaviour with another desperate Darwin fanatic, Julian Derry (a Youth Hostel Association worker) who has for years criminally harassed professor Mark Griffiths at Nottingham Trent University for daring to support the empirical data on Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew. These demented Darwin fanatics are named and exposed in "Science Fraud" the book by Dr Mike Sutton.

Read more on Professor Mark Griffith's Research Gate page on this chapter HEREhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/374859411_The_'Patrick_Matthew_Effect'_in_Science






Wednesday 15 February 2023

Patrick Matthew - the book: "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory"

Science Fraud, the book, is now available also on Kindle. 

In The UK (here)

In the USA (here)

And on all other Amazon sites worldwide. 

Now you can take a peek inside. 😎.




Monday 6 February 2023

Science fraud also available as an E Book

 


 


Monday 11 July 2022

Pitfalls of Plagiarism: The Case Study of Joachim Dagg AKA "Dagg The Plagiarist"

An important finding from my original research data on who cited Patrick Matthew's 1831 book "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture" before 1858 has been plagiarised by Joachim Dagg. 

The story of Dagg's research plagiarism in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society is told on a couple of pages of my latest book (Sutton 2022) "Science Fraud", which is published by Curtis Press, and is available directly from the publisher (here).

 My book's full title is: "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory". It can be ordered from any good bookshop, many online bookstores and is available on Amazon UK (here), elsewhere throughout all Amazon sites in Europe and most recently in the USA (here).

Dagg's Confession is now Published in the Public Domain

Last night Dagg let it slip that he is "rationalising" his plagiarism of my data. 

Such guilt neutralisation rationalisation is a well know pitfall leading people to commit acts of plagiarism (e.g. here) In his desperate haste to seek to rationalize his malicious plagiary, Dagg writes 1942. of course, the real date of Selby's newly discovered citation of Matthew's (1831) book is 1842. 



There is a page dedicated to the repeat plagiarism of  Dr Mike Sutton's original, prior published, research data on PatrickMatthew.Com. The specific page is here

Dagg's accidental confession is forensically archived here 

This blog post is archived here for easier citation and for posterity.

Monday 20 June 2022

Book Reviews of Science Fraud

Book Reviews of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory"



Review by Ton Munnich "More evidence from Suttonon Goodreads (archived here) and Amazon Netherlands (archived here


Review by David Parkin "We may have to rethink our preconceptions about Darwin and his work" on Amazon (archived here)  


Review by HBK (AKA Ian Hardie) "Darwin - the case for plagarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory of Natuaral Selection" On Amazon (archived here) On Goodreads (here) (archived here)


Review by Catherine Philips "A fascinating read" On Amazon (archived here) On Goodreads (archived here)


Review by Leon McNair (AKA The Kilted Scotsman) on Goodreads (here) Archived (here)

Sunday 29 May 2022

American Scientists and Journalists Wanted by Curtis Press

 On June 15 2022 Curtis Press release my new book "Science Fraud: Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory" in the USA.


Scientists and Journalists in the USA can request a free review copy of Science fraud from Curtis Press.

Curtis Press knows that my book must reach a critical mass of readership for the independently verifiable facts that are in it to be accepted and for the current Victorian myth of Darwin's supposed original honest, unique genius originality, to be busted by veracity. Therefore the publisher is now inviting American scientists and journalists to get in touch in order to receive a complimentary review copy of the book that changes everything you once thought you knew about Charles Darwin.

"Science Fraud" has already attracted considerable attention in the press in the UK and elsewhere in Europe following it's release in this region earlier in 2022.

1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archivedIn Press Reader (archived)  

2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)

3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)

4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in fulland here

5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)

6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)

7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022) 

8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)

9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)

10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)

11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)

12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)

Visit the Patrick Matthew website for a wealth of fully evidenced empirical data in the story of Charles Darwin, Patrick Matthew and Alfred Wallace. Here.

Science fraud is available to order from all online or other bookshops. Available from Curtis Press (Here) and on Amazon (Here



Sunday 1 May 2022

UK National and Regional Press Coverage of "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Tgheory"

 Science Fraud in the press since published in the UK ans Europe in February 2022



1. The Mail on Sunday (Feb 2022) (archived)

In Press Reader  (archived)  

2. Sputnick (Feb 2022) (archived)

3. The Scottish Sun (Feb 2022) (archived)

4. The Times (Feb 2022) (archived in full)

and here

5. The Courier (Feb 2022) (archived) (pdf)

6. The Daily Squib (Mar 2022) (archived)

7. Sunday Express (Mar 2022) 

8. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)

9. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)

10. Sunday Express serialised 3 (27 Mar 2022)

11. Sunday Express serialised 4 (3 Apr 2022)

12. The Courier (April 30 2022) (archived)

Thursday 21 April 2022

Wikipedia Patrick Matthew Page is being Run by Putin Type Kremlin Type Propagandist Liars, Fact Denial, Empirical Data Brute Censors!

 If you take a visit to the Wikipedia Patrick Matthew page and if you can tell desperate nonsense put there by desperate Darwin worshippers to hide newly unearthed empirical data that proves Darwin lied and plagiarised the entire theory of macroevolution by natural selection, from empirical facts, why not spend time reading the newly unearthed empirical facts rationally and calmly explained. 

No wonder members of the desperate so-called "Darwin Industry" are running about like headless zombie chickens. Dr Mike Sutton's bombshell data has blown their little clucking heads clean off!

Brief outline of empirical facts, all rationally explained Here (archived for citation Here)

Zombie chicken Darwin propaganda guano on Wikipedia (archived on 21st April 2022 for future scholars to cite ) Here

Most of the Wikipedia propaganda about Patrick Matthew and its content that is seeking to refute empirical research into Darwin's plagiarism of Matthew's theory and associated lies is complete lies and misinformation that has been put there, or else contains the claptrap written by those who have not actually read the new data on Darwin's and Wallace's fraud, by those caught deleting the empirical facts on who actually did read and then cite Matthew's book and the theory in it pre-1831. 

The nasty empirical fact deleting propagandists include Wikipedia corrupt Darwin Industry support editor "Dave Souza" - fully outed having been caught out deleting new found empirical facts in an experiment (before he was finally forced to stop deleting them when his activities were recorded) and he is now named and shamed in "Science Fraud" with all the evidence archived).

The ludicrous efforts of  Dr Dagg and Dr Mike Weale are also on the Wikipedia Patrick Matthew page. Both of these men maliciously plagiarised Dr Sutton's original prior published Selby data in papers they had published in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Both Weale and Dagg are now named and shamed for posterity for that behaviour and, in Weale's case far worse besides, in "Science Fraud".) All such behaviour of theirs is fully evidenced as malicious activities and is cited to fully archived sources in "Science Fraud".

The malicious obsessive lies and harassment activities of  Dr Julian Derry are all over that Patrick Matthew Wikipedia page. This vile and Darwin obsessed individual has committed dozens of acts of nasty criminal harassment via poison pen emails etc and even sent the author of Science Fraud a vile obscene anal rape tweet. Dr Julian Derry's vile obscene and harassment behaviour is fully recorded and also fully archived and referenced. He is named and shamed and fully referenced to archive sources in "Science Fraud".

Science fraud, the bombshell 2022 book is available from all good book shops and on Amazon: HERE Or direct form the science publisher Curtis Press HERE

No wonder Wikipedia is the world's worst encyclopedia. The shame of it is now published and will be read about for centuries to come.


This blog post is archived for scholarly citation. https://archive.ph/K5uyS


Wednesday 13 April 2022

World Influencers: How can we close the "influencer gap" on liars, monsters, plagiarists and their facilitators, pseudo scholars and empirical fact deniers?

 Dr Mike Sutton v who? Patrick Matthew v who? And what about you v who? How do you do?


October 2023 and Mike Sutton's world influencer of all time rankings have become yet higher. Archived here,





Search on World Influencer rankings since 1800 Here (archived Here)

(NOTE: All rankings in this blog post are for 2022)
 
Are you on the list of the most influential? Are you ranked as a world influencer? How do your heroes or those you despise rank? 




Patrick Matthew is 100% proven to have influenced Charles Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's influencers and is proven beyond all reasonable doubt to have influenced by Darwin and Wallace to plagiarise his prior published theory of the "natural process of selection." The reason he is not ranked in the top 20 influencers all time in the world is simply because of Darwin's and Wallace's science fraud by plagiary and then their serial lies, and the falsehoods told by their adoring pseudo-scholarly fans, about Matthew and his (1831) book and who read it before they copied the theory (and much more besides) from it and then lied by calling it their own. Get the fact HERE




Darwin's World and Academic Influence (archived at April 2022)








Monday 14 March 2022

Science Fraud is now being Serialised in the Scottish National Press

 Read the introduction in the Scottish Sunday Express: Here

Read the serialised, hugely truncated and specially edited for the Scottish Express Chapter 1 HERE


Buy "Science Fraud" Here on Amazon, from the Publisher Curtis Press Direct, or order from your local bookshop.


This blogpost of 14 March 2022 is archived HERE

Friday 11 March 2022

A Further Investigation of those who were First to Be Second (F2B2): The case of Thomas Laycock

On Matthew's (1831) apparently original phrase "mental of instinctive powers."

 "Science Fraud" not only lists those who actually cited Matthew's 1831 book before 1858, it also lists (List 2) those who BigData research reveals were apparently first (after Matthew 1831) to go into print with apparently unique "Matthewisms". Being apparently "first to be second" with an apparently unique "Matthewism" they are said in short to be "F2B2".

Thomas Laycock is one of the names in my List 2. Not only does "Science Fraud" reveal his works on the theme of organic evolution, it also reveals who he associated with who were associates of Charles Darwin.

But today (11 March 2022) I discovered something more in my continued research into this area. Today, I found that without citing Matthew (1831) Laycock (1832) wrote extensively aping Matthew's work on his observations on the fact that trees that are artificially selected by humans are of inferior quality to those growing in the wild. Here

This provides yet more confirmatory evidence to support the F2B2 hypothesis stated in Science Fraud, the book. 

In my most recent book "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" there are many examples where those in List 2 are found to have been interested in the same lines of enquiry as Matthew, or to have later written about observations he first made, but without citing. Some were F2B2 and later in other publications they then actually cited Matthew's bombshell book "On Naval Timber". All before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's theory and claimed it as their own. 

Schacter (2012) Provides further information about Laycock (who first introduced himself to me when I used the IDD method to see if anyone was F2B2 with Matthew's (1831) apparently original phrase "mental or instinctive powers"). Amazingly, although he wrote on Matthew's (1831) topic of organic evolution and used Matthew's apparently original term without citing him Schacter (p.115) reveals that Laycock wrote on the topic of instinct the same concept that Matthew had pioneered. 

Method

Schacter's (2012) book "Forgotten Ideas, Neglected Pioneers: Richard Semon and the Story of Memory" was found simply by typing the following search term into Google's standard search page: "Laycock" "Matthew" "Naval Timber" as in the image below.

The result I got today 13.03.2022 is archived Here. And if you scroll down the Google results first page of hits you will find Schacter's excellent book comes up. 

Next if we take the same three terms as above - in inverted commas exactly as above - but click for Google to search on books we find Schacter's earlier book also covered this topic. The image below reveals all.


As this research continues to reveal more about the previously unknown life of Matthew's 1831 book, namely who read it and was influenced by it, and who that "knowledge contamination" in turn influenced like a meme, it is important to remember that Laycock introduced himself to me because he was conjured up out of the publication record like a human spectre, living in a long forgotten book in the historic publication record. The spell that bought him forward was simply Googling the apparently coined by Matthew (1831) turn of phrase "mental or instinctive powers."

Those self-proclaimed sceptics who write in desperate defense of the "Darwin Industry" such as Professor Shermer all lacked the most basic but necessary skeptical curiosity to check their own bias when writing in support of Darwin's proven lie that Matthew's theory was hidden in the appendix of his book and that no one read it so it can't have influenced Darwin. Shermer's "its not a zero sum game" flim-flam in that regard is dealt with in Science Fraud. But really, Shermer, and all those other acolytes of the bearded God / father substitute Charles Darwin should have used Big Data analysis of the 40+million or more books and articles now scanned and in the Google library. Namely, Shermer (and others like him) should have looked at who was apparently first to be second (F2B2) with apparently original Matthewisms, as I did. Here is what Shermer writes. Note the excruciating fact that Matthew's phrase "mental or instinctive powers' is there in the text Shermer thinks nobody was influenced by (Shermer 2002) Here

The plot thickens as we drill down deeper for historical gold in the publication record

When we simply Google "Darwin" "Laycock" the influence of Laycock (who had apparently been influenced by Matthew's 1831 book) on Charles Darwin becomes startlingly clear. Now we see "experts" who were misled by the Matthew Effect in science not to focus their attention on the cultural tracers of Matthew's book explain the influence of Laycock on Darwin: Here

Frank Sulloway (1979) in "Freud, Biologist of the Mind" the writes on the topic here


Archived editions of this page:

13.03.2022 Here

.  . .

Monday 7 March 2022

Oh the Satire of it all: The Daily Squib Nails the Credulous Darwinite Zombie Horde to the floor of their own stupidity

Today (07 March 2022) The Daily Squib sets the record straight on the Charles - The Dirty Plagiarist -Darwin, the "Darwin Industry" and its enablers - such as the fact censoring and malicious disinformation spreading pseudo-scholars of Wikipedia. Here (archived here) .





The cat is out of the bag on Charles Darwin's filthy science fraud by lies and plagiarism and no amount of the traditional fact denial pseudo scholarship of the Darwin Industry can ever get it back in
https://t.co/QgQGmQ8wcM @CurtisPress_ @DailySquibs @DAILYSQUIB @SoniaPoulton
. .