Question: What is more likely:
a) Getting the prior-published theory of natural selection from your editor (Selby) who read it in Patrick Matthew's (1831) book and then cited it years earlier (originally discovered by Sutton 2014) - or
(b) Discovering it inside your head whilst suffering from malarial brain fever after that same editor published your (Sarawak) paper on natural selection?
Darwinists are proven stupid because they still believe Wallace's fairy story is true and think the answer is b. And from that cause they have hung his picture above the plagiarist and serial liar - Charles Darwin - in the Natural History Museum in London - at tax payer's expense! How mad is that?
 |
| An Exhibition of Stupidity |
Proper science @Sciencesharenew focuses on anomalies and paradoxes that dis-confirm accepted 'knowledge beliefs': http://t.co/SBIihYvf7E
— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) September 6, 2015
