After the Age of Enlightenment, facts are supposed be judged on their merits, not source of publication

No One needs a Darwin Scholar Licence granted by those named after him to know that writing the exact opposite to what you are told is lying pic.twitter.com/QCYJh9d4Un

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 10, 2017

+

To a scientist that question would have no bearing on their ability to weigh independently verifiable facts. For your benefit I'm an atheist pic.twitter.com/GLVtk5DsFr

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 10, 2017