Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Friday 28 September 2018

Follow the Big Data

Do otherwise rational scientists believe in a dual supernatural miracle?

Thursday 27 September 2018

Historian calls out fact denying pseudo scholar biologists

Wednesday 26 September 2018

Big Data Makes Social Science More Palatable to Other Scientists

Wednesday 19 September 2018

Science Fraud by Plagiarism: Darwin the serial liar

A message for nasty harassing pseudo scholarly neerdowell Darwin worshipping nutjob troll cyberstalkers everywhere. Howdya like dem apples?

Monday 17 September 2018

Ideas spread like viruses


Friday 14 September 2018

Giant redwood tree stripped of its bark

Wednesday 12 September 2018

This terrible: Darwin is a proven liar and plagiarist

Monday 10 September 2018

On Steven J. Gould

Sunday 9 September 2018

Digital Afterlife

Saturday 8 September 2018

Newly Unearthed Facts can Drive Vulnerable Neerdowells Obsessively Raving Bonkers. Slap a Nasty Jealous Little Cyberstalking Monkey Hard on the Head with the Law

+ +

Thursday 6 September 2018

Darwin is a proven liar and glory thieving plagiarist

Saturday 1 September 2018

On Giant Redwoods: Another Myth about Matthew is Busted


Although Darwin, who along with Wallace, claimed priority for Patrick Matthew's 1831 prior-published theory of evolution by natural selection and Darwin wrote in his own defence that Matthew was an obscure writer on forest trees, we now know that Darwin's friend and correspondent John Lindley published a fallacious story that Lobb, rather than Matthew and his son John were first to introduce giant redwoods into Britain. Moreover, the  journal of which Lindley was editor was in possession of a letter, penned by Patrick Matthew, proving the Matthew's priority for that. Giant redwood fame was for years  wrongly attributed to another, robbing patrick Matthew and his son John of their rightful glory on the topic of trees.  The consequences of Patrick Matthew not being hailed a hero, as Lobb and Lindley were in so many publications - between 1853 and 1866 -  particularly when the grand enormity of these trees was brought home to the British via a display of one at the Crystal Palace Exhibition in 1851 -  must have assisted Darwin later (from 1860 onward) in so successfully portraying him to other naturalists as merely an obscure Scottish writer on forest trees. And we know that the myth stuck. 

John Lindley is an interesting character in the story of Matthew, Darwin and Wallace. He was a professor of botany at the University of London and best friend of  William Hooker - who was the father of Darwin's best friend Joseph Hooker (who dishonestly countersigned Darwin's letter to the Gardener's Chronicle in 1860 that contained Darwin's proven lie that no naturalist had read Matthew's original ideas on natural selection before 1860). Lindley co-authored an encyclopedia with the naturalist and polymath John Loudon. In 1832, Loudon reviewed Matthew's book and wrote that it appeared to have something original to say on 'the origin of species'. That was 26 years before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's theory and claimed it as their own unique independent conceptions. 

These facts are not a conspiracy theory as some today are writing to keep them down, because they are all independently verifiable . What they do represent is a great preponderance of newly unearthed evidence that the scientific community kept Matthew down by writing falsehoods and lies and attributing his unique and fundamental contributions to others. 

Get the verifiable New Data facts here