Darwinism Holidaying from Proper history is Over: Proper history about independently verifiable facts, not about lies and using them to manipulate others

 Patrick Matthew originated and then had published the first full explanation of macro evolution by the process of natural selection in his book "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture" (1831) and followed it up with his second book "Emigration Fields" (1839) in order to make the case for conquest and Anglo Saxon colonization of other people's lands by what he thought represented the best genetic and moral variety of human beings. Later Matthew would write to Darwin a confession of his selfishness and repentance for so doing. However, Darwin the  plagiarist, serial liar and apex propagandist, who stole Matthew's theory, did no such thing. His sole aim was personal fame and he manipulated others to assist him in that endeavor by lying about Matthew's (1831) book and who he knew read it before he and Wallace copied the bombshell ideas in it and then claimed to have originated them independently of Matthew's prior publications.

I don't full agree with Marx's quote above, that I edited with the text "[Proper]".

 In my more considered opinion: 

"Proper history is not the same as any individual manipulating, exploiting the vulnerable and otherwise using people to achieve their own ends for propaganda and myth making. Proper history results from accurately data gathering, recording and objectively chronicling the actions of people and their various results, impacts and influence on the social and physical world."

In light of the new data that busts the Darwin and Wallace myth, it is time for proper historians of science (not Darwin super fans) to declare that the Darwin worshiping fanatical holiday from empirical data facts is over.