Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Thursday 23 August 2018

Nullius in Verba

Wednesday 22 August 2018

Independently verifiable newly unearthed facts trump unevidenced knowledge gap filling made-up claptrap evertime.

Woo Woo Wallace the Anti Vaxxer co-plagiarist (with Darwin) and spiritualist fan

Sunday 19 August 2018

Lessons for nasty deluded little stalkers: No. 1 (in a big list)

Academics such as Derry who harass and stalk others because they made and published important new discoveries will most likely be sacked by their university. Quite right too. Such disgusting behaviour by Derry is a disgrace.

Wednesday 15 August 2018

Nullius in Verba and the Darwin Supermyth

Monday 13 August 2018

On the Growing Acceptance of the New Discovery of Darwin's Plagiarism

 The above article is here and archived here

What many may be outraged to learn is that Darwin blatantly lied in 1860, in a letter to the famous French naturalist, and then in the third edition of the Origin of Species, when he wrote that no other naturalist / no one whatsoever read Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published full theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Because Matthew had informed him in 1860 that the very opposite was true. Moreover, the newly discovered (by me) data reveals that – contrary to the “no one read Matthew" myth parroted by endless Darwin scholars since Darwin started it as a lie - seven naturists in fact cited Matthew’s (1831) book pre-1858 Darwin and Wallace.

There is much more. And before some frothing at the mouth barking mad Cult of Darwin troll jumps in to claim otherwise here I am not a creationist I am an atheist and I think evolution by natural selection is a brilliant theory. But it’s not Darwin’s – or Wallace’s - and all the independently verifiable new evidence suggests Darwin plagiarised pre-1858 it as well as proves absolutely that he was a blatant plagiarising liar by glory theft.

Knowledge improves with more knowledge. I found the hidden books that overturn the Darwin myth. Darwin used to be my hero too. But the newly discovered facts disabused me. 

Darwin Cult Cyberstalkers

Wednesday 1 August 2018

A really funny conspiracy theory to defuse the rusty ammunition used by fact denial pseudo-skeptics

Today I wrote this in reply to one of my email correspondents:

'Darwin was my hero too. It was when I realised that so many claims to originality of my heroes were completely debunked by irrefutable published evidence in the hidden record, newly detected with Big Data methods, (but in fact no longer can be so detected since Google was handed over to A.I. [ of course the publications exist - thankfully  we now know what they are but finding new ones with the method no longer works] see this peer reviewed academic paper on that subject  that I turned to my then hero Richard Dawkins in the certainty that orthodoxy was right and he certainly did coin the term and concept of the Selfish Gene and that Charles Darwin did coin the term and concept of  the natural process of selection. But I was dismayed and  double shocked to find my two rocks of Gibraltar were pile driven to gravel by the new found disconfirming irrefutable facts. I hope that such examples, might be of some use - when put with others - to show that the publication record is like the geological fossil record. What is in it exists. Analogously to organic fossils, words and terms are like fossils, they show us the evolution of ideas. The publication record reveals this evolution. Unless someone has faked historical books and manuscripts at a massive level and inserted them in libraries and bookshops all over the world that is. Now there is a very funny yet real daft-as-a-brush conspiracy theory to throw back at fact-denial pseudo-skeptics.'