The Patrick Matthew Effect in Science: Naming and shaming just some facilitators and Darwin industry harassment fanatics: Part 1

 Over the coming days and weeks I will be naming and shaming just some of those individuals and organizations proven by their recorded actions to involved in seeking to suppress the empirical evidence of Darwin's and Wallace's science fraud by plagiarism. The Springer Science book Chapter by Sutton and Griffiths (2023) mentions some of this behaviour. A future book is planned to reveal the complete evidenced details. 

1. Joachim L Dagg

Dr Dagg, who is a member of the Ronin Institute, plagiarized Dr. Mike Sutton's (2014) unique discovery that Selby (Wallace's Sarawak paper's journal chief editor) prior cited Patrick Matthew's (1831) book containing he full macroevolution theory of the natural process of selection. Details of where Dagg did this can be found here. And there you can see also in that post Dagg's effective admission of his unethical and unscholarly plagiarism, whilst seeking to excuse his actions is fully evidenced in his own words. Furthermore, you can see the fact Dagg did plagiarize the Selby discovery because he prior mentions Sutton's discovery of it in his childish and malicious book review of "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" (Sutton 2014) in 2014 on Amazon books where he calls himself "Joda", and on his equally very childish silly blog site. see images below for the proof of that.

Clearly, Dagg's unethically unscientific behaviour is firm empirical evidence for The Patrick Matthew Effect in science. Click the book image below to find out more about the Patrick Matthew effect.

More information on Dagg and his obsessive harassment and fact denial behaviour can be found on the Patrick Matthew blog site Darwin super fan harassment page: HERE

The next post will reveal the harassment fact denial malicious behaviour of Dr\Dagg's anti-fact facilitating friend and fellow delusional Charles Darwin superfan, Dr Mike Weale. (see Part 2)

Joahochim L dagg - Research data plagiarist is a proven pseudo-scholar. Proven by his own words.

Here is the article by "Dagg the Plagiarist" that slyly plagiarizes Sutton's Selby cited Matthew discovery. It sidesteps all the main New Data findings to try to argue Darwin was not a plagiarist. Disgrace to science! @LinneanSociety should be ashamed: https://t.co/Q6Colo3Oz8 https://t.co/naTZm3oxah pic.twitter.com/hll7Pzcb85

— BentSociety @The Veracity Institute (@OnNavalTimber) February 14, 2020

The Selby (Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper journal Chief Editor and friend of Darwin's great friend Leonard Jenyns) cited Matthew's (1831) original theory of evolution by natural selection was not discovered first by Dagg, nor anyone else before Sutton uniquely unearthed it from the historic publication record with his BigData IDD method in 2013/14.

Sutton's Selby cited Matthew unique discovery was first published by Sutton in 2014 In the 500 page E-book Nullius in Verba (Thinker Media)   - "Dagg the Plagiarist" wrote a childishly jealous malicious pseudo-scholarly review of the 2017 book Nulius in Verba archived here and admits to reading Sutton's 2014 book here

In two peer reviewed academic articles Sutton's original research discovery of the Selby cited Matthew original finding was published here in 2014 and here in 2015

 Empirical data underpins proper science. And all data is of interest to science.

Here is the concrete empirical data scientific evidence of Joahochim Dagg's knowing malicious plagiarism of research data first unearthed by Dr Mike Sutton and published by Thinker Media in 2014, Vae Victus (2017) and Curtis Press (2022) and various peer reviewed academic articles in between and Dagg's clear pseudo scientific weird gloating refusal to admit such original and paradigm changing research findings plagiarism is wrong. Image below can be seen on Dagg's Twitter account archived,

Clearly Darwin Superfans (and Dagg is just one of many of them) cannot behave like proper academic scholars and scientists or historians of science - so mentally disturbed are they by the new empirical data that bursts their beloved paradigm based on the now completely debunked Darwin Supermyth. Theirs is a credulously unshakable blind belief and empirical fact denial "religious" worship of Charles Darwin. This explains their malicious anti-science behavior.