There is a back hole at the heart of the history of discovery in science. And it hides the truth about how the world's greatest science science fraud by lies and plagiarism played a necessary causal role in the Holocaust.
Try telling that to credulous foot washing Darwin worshipers who doggedly believe Darwin and Wallace DID have independent miraculous conceptions of the theory we newly know their friends influencers and editor had prior cited in the literature record https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/wCXUhZMid3— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 15, 2019
Charles Darwin, who plagiarised the prior published full theory of evolution by natural selection from the Scot Patrick Matthew, kept his own Christian notion of the "Creator" in his theory replicating book the Origin of Species. There is plenty of sound evidence to argue that Darwin was atheist or agnostic. And I think he most likely was. Yet in some (but not all) of the six editions of The Origin of Species Darwin kept the notion of a so-called "Creator" God, deliberately setting the whole process of natural selection, in motion. He referred to what he called "the Creator" in all editions of the Origin, but in the editions discussed here he clearly wrote that he believed what he called "the Creator" was actually behind designing what Matthew (1831) originally coined the "natural process of selection" to run. Darwin originally re-wrote Matthew's orignal term by way of a four word shuffle to "process of natural slection."
Darwin, if he was to explain Matthew's theory to scientists and the wider public in order to gain its acceptance, was no doubt compelled to plagiarize Matthew's essential four word term - the theory being completely about selection that was natural (as opposed to artificial) and worked as a process to eventually create new varities and species. Associatively, Darwin also no doubt felt compelled to have to plagiarize in the opening Chapter of the Origin of Species (Darwin 1859) Matthew's essential explanatory analogy of differences between varieties of species raised in the wild by nature and those raised artificially by humans. As evidence of his plagiarism in this regard the highly renowned (except by Darwin fact denial superfans) social anthropologist and historian of science, Loren Eiseley, discovered Darwin, in a private essay, replicated Matthew's highly syncratic and original analogy of differences between trees raised in nurseries and those in the wild (see the facts here). Obviously, in the Origin Darwin carefully swapped that total giveaway of his plagiarism for more general examples.
Darwin most probably did all of this to appease the Christian parson naturalists who ran Western universities and other scientific establishments in the 19th century. By doing this, unlike Matthew, whose work he and Wallace shamefully plagiarised and lied about (see my expert peer reviewed academic articles on the topic Sutton 2014 and Sutton 2015 and my book Nullius in Verba). Darwin appeased the "Establishment" by keeping sedition and heresy (which ran through Matthew's book like words in Blackpool rock) out of his own replicating book, and in doing that his sly replicating work went mainstream so that he became a household name. On the other hand Matthew (1831 p 367), wrote - what was considered sedition at the time - that the upper classes were, for example, unnaturally selecting their progeny to the point of uselessness in nature:
He also committed gross heresy by mocking the notion of God as a "creator" of species (Matthew 1831 p. 382):
And (Matthew 1831 p.383)
And (Matthew 1831 p.384)
Earlier on page 132, in a footnote, Matthew (1831) also mocked Christian priests:
Darwin did not so alienate the establishment with free speech. Instead he censored himself in his plagiarism of Matthew by effectively writing that what he called "the Creator" created the laws that governed natural selection. We see this in Darwin's Origin of Species 1869 - 5th Edition, p. 424) Also in the same edition published in 1860 in the USA. And it is on page 524-525 of the earlier famous third edition of 1861 (in which Darwin was compelled to cite his influencers under the criticism of his peers) as we see below:
On #hatecrime.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 6, 2019
Members of anti-science fact denial Grand Order of Darwin Foot Washers @RichardDawkins @BiolJLinnSoc hate this excellent article on Darwin & the Nazis https://t.co/uVVdKDhC5I
New evidence shows Darwin played causal role in the Holocaust https://t.co/H24sKXShxz pic.twitter.com/BYOuolaFHf
#Matthewism (theory of evolution by natural selection) is socialist theory, because Mathew was a Scottish Chartist leader, plagiarized by the landed gentry member Darwin with the help of the English Establishment. He wrote against the aristocracy & church! https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT https://t.co/6AKNxQho9y— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2019
The Patrick Matthew Burial Project! How the English establishment stole a scientific theory from a true socialist and then started the Holocaust— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2019
1. Theft: https://t.co/aInM0fTdvH
2. A necessary causal factor in the Holocaust: https://t.co/H24sKXShxz pic.twitter.com/OYayZSwiqC
The average person is an idiot who is too lazy to find out the truth & finds it easier to be lied to. Hence the average person wants to be lied to. That's why Trump in the USA and Johnson in the UK were elected. One by the USA nation, the other by Tory Party, both full of idiots. https://t.co/gMfcgqaFPR pic.twitter.com/wjJdhz3U1Q— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 11, 2019
An Explanatory #Analogy for #Plagiarism— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019
Darwin (1859) was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew's (1831) book as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem https://t.co/JVypGV613a