"Invention"! That's ironically true. Darwin is newly proven a self-serving serial-lying plagiarist
Darwin wrote in his autobiography:
'Therefore my success as a man of science, whatever this may have amounted to, has been determined, as far as I can judge, by complex and diversified mental qualities and conditions. Of these, the most important have been—the love of science—unbounded patience in long reflecting over any subject—industry in observing and collecting facts—and a fair share of invention as well as of common sense. With such moderate abilities as I possess, it is truly surprising that I should have influenced to a considerable extent the belief of scientific men on some important points.'
For more evidence and detail on Darwin's serial lying, or "invention" read Nullius in verba: Darwin's greatest secret.
For 155 years, top Darwinists have - to their eternal shame - credulously believed and so trumpeted as true Darwin's self-serving lie about the originator of natural selection. They did so in order to be able to make themselves believe that Darwin and Wallace discovered natural slection independently of Matthew's (1831) original and prior published book containing it. Today, despite the fact I have 100 proven Darwin a liar and 100 per cent proven that top naturalists known to Darwin and Wallace did read Matthew's 1831 before they replicated so much of its original content in 1858, Darwinists such as James Moore have willfully refused to engage with the paradigm changing New Data. Perhaps that is to be expected. After all, they are named for a proven serial lying replicator, and their top Royal Society Darwin medal winning Darwinist guru's, such as Sir Gavin de-Beer, are proven to be credulous believers in Darwin's sneaky lies.
For 155 years, top Darwinists have - to their eternal shame - credulously believed and so trumpeted as true Darwin's self-serving lie about the originator of natural selection. They did so in order to be able to make themselves believe that Darwin and Wallace discovered natural slection independently of Matthew's (1831) original and prior published book containing it. Today, despite the fact I have 100 proven Darwin a liar and 100 per cent proven that top naturalists known to Darwin and Wallace did read Matthew's 1831 before they replicated so much of its original content in 1858, Darwinists such as James Moore have willfully refused to engage with the paradigm changing New Data. Perhaps that is to be expected. After all, they are named for a proven serial lying replicator, and their top Royal Society Darwin medal winning Darwinist guru's, such as Sir Gavin de-Beer, are proven to be credulous believers in Darwin's sneaky lies.
Visit the Patrick Matthew website PatrickMatthew.com to learn more about the true biological father of natural selection.
Let's have a debate - can we please? On Darwin's and Wallace's dual immaculate conceptions: https://t.co/kllTiWKPgI pic.twitter.com/K7LUUXSkI5
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) August 18, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.
On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.
Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.