Roy Davies on Darwin the Plagiarist Misses New Evidence he is Now Surely Aware of

Why no mention of the New Data on Wallace's plagiarism in collusion with Darwin in plagiarising Matthew? They were NOT Wallace's ideas. Those ideas were Matthew's ideas - prior read by the owner and editor of the journal that published Wallace's Sarawak paper.

Just listened to the YouTube interview with Roy Davies @skeptiko on the sly Darwin worshipper John Van Wyhe desperately calling facts he can't argue against a conspiracy theory. He did that in an email to a journalist about my research too. Happy to talk: https://t.co/y6D1rl1NIy

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 31, 2020

.

Roy Davis  fails to mention the new (2014) knowledge contamination evidence that Matthew influenced both Wallace and Darwin. The new data he weirdly ignores on Wallace being a plagiarist of Matthew's theory and explanatory examples : http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

 

 

 

 

.

Although I know you know about this, Mike, some of your followers might not be aware of my 2010 review of "The Darwin Conspiracy". https://t.co/bOeJtx10tW

— Hugh Dower (@HughDower) September 1, 2020