How did Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace supposedly independently and miraculously replicate what Darwin, Wallace, de Beer, Mayer, Dawkins and many other top biologists said was essentially the exact same full theory of evolution by natural selection that Patrick Matthew originated and had published in 1831? And why, in light of the new data that busts Darwin and Wallace's excuse that Matthew's theory was unread before 1860, are the Darwin worshiping Linnean Society and the Royal Society now shamefully publishing desperately silly papers by cyberstalking obscene criminals, workplace harassment criminals and repeat research plagiarists that claim Matthew's theory is now suddenly and yet ever so conveniently to be argued to be significantly different to that published by Darwin and Wallace?
Because in the Cuckoo Land of the the Darwin Industry so many people continue to live in a cloud of denial when it comes to the scientific empirical evidence of Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory the Patrick Matthew Violin was born to blow those clouds away.
See the story of the violin unfolding on the Patrick Matthew website: https://patrickmatthew.com/the-patrick-matthew-violin.html
The story is covered by the Press Association Here
The official photo shoot and filming of The Patrick Matthew Violin took place in glorious sunshine on the morning of May 21 2024 at Megginch Castle.
The violin is made from an ancient apple tree that fell in the orchard of Megginch Castle.
Dr Mike Sutton (owner of the violin) was there with its master violin maker Steve Burnett of Edinburgh, profession violinist and famous TV and film actor Thoren Ferguson who played the violin, top Press Association photographer Jane Barlow (the last person to photograph the Queen) and Hon. Catherine Drummond Herdman of Megginch Castle.
In the current so-called "post truth age" where influential people are denying things that can be empirically proven to be true with empirical data (also known as lying) photographs of the truth are important.
The editor, publisher, poet, and humorist, Thomas Hood was born in London. After his father, who was a bookseller, died in 1811, Hood worked in a counting house until illness forced him to move to Dundee, Scotland, to recover with relatives. In 1818 he returned to London to work as an engraver.
This information is about his visit to Patrick Matthew in the Summer of 1815. that is some 15 years before Matthew wrote his bombshell book of 1831.
There is now a Facebook page for those interested in having an empirical evidence led history of science rather than the current art based dominance: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1194911951494796
The empirical data who actually did read Matthew's (1831) published theory before Darwin and Wallace 1858/59) replicated it splits the Darwin and Wallace independent co-discoverers supermyth
“It’s like taking one history, and putting it right on top of another, like taking one man’s legacy and putting it right on top of another, until one day, it gets pushed down so deep, buried so deep, can’t no one ever find it no more,”
The Burial (2023) by Maggie Betts.
Today I put a comment on The Conversation, on an article about Darwin being given more credit than he deserved for research on earthworms.
I fully expect the empirical fact zombie horde of the Darwin Industry to arrive and write the usual lies and delusional brainless claptrap that characterizes all such passive aggressive, and downright aggressive, credulous authoritarian types.
Here is an image of my comment, in case it gets weirdly deleted. Here is the link to it https://theconversation.com/how-a-little-known-clergyman-studying-worms-by-candlelight-in-the-1700s-inspired-charles-darwin-but-didnt-get-the-credit-he-deserved-227089
