Plagiarising Science Fraud

Plagiarising Science Fraud
Newly Discovered Facts, Published in Peer Reviewed Science Journals, Mean Charles Darwin is a 100 Per Cent Proven Lying, Plagiarising Science Fraudster by Glory Theft of Patrick Matthew's Prior-Published Conception of the Hypothesis of Macro Evolution by Natural Selection

Thursday, 16 May 2024

Art, most ironically, comes to the recue of a corrupted history and science

 In the current so-called "post truth age" where influential people are denying things that can be empirically proven to be true with empirical data (also known as lying) photographs of the truth are important.

Here then, for example, the art of photography Andy Sutton most ironically can also be used to inform science and history of the need to be informed by independently verifiable empirical data, not by artfully made up beloved science myths.
Our history of science has been wrongfully corrupted by a knowing lie told by Charles Darwin that no single person read Patrick Matthew's prior publication of the entire theory of evolution by natural selection. But today we now newly know, thanks to BigData analysis that in empirically proven reality, because its in published print in the historic publication record (also known as old books in print) that at least 30 people read and cited Matthew's (1831) book containing the theory before Darwin and Wallace in 1858/59 replicated it and claimed it as their own independently conceived bombshell theory. Thereafter, Darwin called it "my theory".
Do our history of science "experts" and our scientists need to be embarrassed by a photography art exhibition containing beautiful photographs of those books and periodicals , the very books and magazines etc, published before 1858 they are effectively hoping will remain buried in oblivion? Curtis Press Nonscience







No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.