Today I asked Meta's A.I. a series of questions. Its answers reveal that it prioritizes giving out false and disproven answers over the empirical data fact-based answers it has access to that disprove them. In what is currently known as "The Post Truth Age", this finding suggests A.I. may well be an enemy of empirical fact led objective truth and progress and a friend of beloved misinformation held sacred by the majority of people.
The following images are screen shots of the conversation had with Meta A.I yesterday and today revealing it's inbuilt bias to debunked orthodox beliefs and its claims it will seek not to do so in the future. Can we take what it says with anything more than a pinch of salt given its flawed programming, that has missed out programming code preventing it from presenting factually incorrect answers or preventing it from censoring facts that many users won't like because they are heretical but true?
Meta A.I, responds in text to my questions to it that are in the blue boxes. Note there are some large spaces between some of the questions and answer images because I had to hack Bloggers image cut off limit by various means and this was the result.
[
Please note: Meta A.I. is bullshitting above to fill a gap in its knowledge. In fact, Darwin's big lie, after Matthew informed him in a published letter in 1860 that his book and the ideas in it had been read and cited pre-1858 by other naturalists including Loudon was to write to other naturalists and to write in every single following edition of The Origin of Species the massive deliberateself-serving lie that no one read his book and the ideas in it before 1860! That proven lie has been swallowed by historians of science and science ever since.]
A telling question
Will it though? Will it really or is it just saying that? So far it looks very much like unless you know the correct empirical data led information that Meta AI might feed you the wrong predominant majority view instead of the actual newly unearthed but painful facts as it did in the case of Darwin's and Wallace's Plagiarism and lies about who we newly know really did read Matthew complete prior published theory.
So what happened the next day on 21 July 2025?
CONCLUSION
Most people now know what the Turing Test for A.I. is. Well this exercise has given us what could be called The Trump Test, which is a test for an A.I. that is a pathological liar and bullshitter. Not that the A.I. necessarily has to have a memory of "conscience" to fail the Trump Test, it just has to be missing the code (s Trump's brain does) to ensure it does not intentionally or systematically give misleading, inaccurate and untruthful answers.
Meta A.I. is programmed to mislead us. It is programmed to pretend it has a memory and learns and uses what it learns to inform us in the future. It can't, It has no memory between conversations. It still presents the predominant view predominantly even though it can access empirical data that disproves that predominant view.
Meta A.I. "moving forward" is adding to lies and dishonesty in human society and purported "knowledge" in the problematic Post Truth Age.
