|This is me. I stand firm and|
challenge the corrupt
Darwin Deification Industry
with 100 per cent proven facts
Academic corruption in an area such as the history of science is likely to be subtle. Were it any other way, perpetrators who deliberately hide significant facts from the public and their peers and students, would not be able to get away with it for very long. Subtlety is not evidence of any kind of conspiracy, it is simply the only effective way that so many criminal offences are committed by those who wish to avoid detection. And just as so many legitimate members of society facilitate crimes such as theft by selling highly specialist tools such as crow-bars, bolt cutters lock picks and slide hammers to the general public, so to do many of those involved in what we might name "academic agenda project fraud" work anonymously from the inside, slyly astroturfing, or else simply assisting salaried academics to hide facts from the public by brute censorship in publications where they have power to delete facts that undermine any extremely carefully crafted and orchestrated agenda-view. Such subtle academic fraud, is today, and has for some time been happening, on the Patrick Matthew page on the Wikipedia encyclopaedia. Let me explain and reveal the facts:
ReviewsThe United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine published an extended review in the 1831 Part II and 1831 Part III numbers of the magazine; it praised Matthew's book in around 13,000 words, highlighting that "The British Navy has such urgent claims on the vigilance of every person as the bulwark of his independence and happiness, that any effort for supporting and improving its strength, lustre, and dignity, must meet with unqualified attention." The review did not mention the appendix to the book.. However, it did, in Part II, on page 457 stridently criticise Matthew's then heretical conception of macroevolution by natural selection, which in fact runs throughout his entire book intertwined with his then seditious chartist politics: "But we disclaim participation in his ruminations on the law of Nature, or on the outrages committed upon reason and justice by our burthens of hereditary nobility, entailed property, and insane enactments."
Experiment result 1
Postscript 10th May 2016 15.38
- (cur | prev) 08:58, 10 May 2016 Dave souza (talk | contribs) . . (41,646 bytes) (-449) . . (Undid revision 719532504 by 2A02:C7D:9E34:8100:6194:58D7:E3DC:219 (talk) unsourced, contrary to published source and dubious) (undo)
- (cur | prev) 07:33, 10
- May 2016 2a02:c7d:9e34:8100:6194:58d7:e3dc:219 (talk) . . (42,095 bytes) (+449) . . (Added fact from the literature that the United Services journal actually DID mention Matthew's heretical conception) (undo)
Is there one or many people hiding behind this Wikipedia editor name Dave Souza?
Corrupt #Wikipedia #Cult is once again begging the public to help it put misinformation online.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 25, 2021
Proof they are maliciously publishing misinformation to mislead the public: https://t.co/1rvz2T287X pic.twitter.com/FfVmTIv7ET