Darwinophile nutjobs hate this kind of thing

I regularly get hate mail about this sort of good thing. Not real hate mail, of course. Not individual letters cut out of newspapers by knife-sharpener morons & stuck on paper to make scary words. Just emails by pseudo-scholarly Darwinophile weirdos.https://t.co/iIfOfqJKMg … pic.twitter.com/V1R06aQwS3

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 4, 2018

Dogma ruins everything

I would just like to try to explain this quietly and respectfully to you Richard: That is just like trying to explain independently verifiable facts to your credulous rude aggressive worshippers on the @RichardDawkins Foundation. Peer reviwed Facts e,g: https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 3, 2018

And other independently verifiable, expert peer reviewed, newly discovered, facts unearthed in the 19th century literature with BigData techniques (IDD) that fingers-in-their-ears and hands-over-their eyes Dawkinites and Darwinites blatantly refuse to accept

1. http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

2. http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66



+

Greedy Alfred Wallace shot 17 apes for their skins!

Letter to an author (sent today) : 

Hi [Name removed]

I enjoyed your article on Wallace shooting apes in Sarawak. I investigated his odd claim (unique in the history of both malarial fever and scientific breakthrough discovery) to have independently conceived the theory of macroevolution by natural selection whilst recovering from malarial fever in Sarawak. It turns out that the naturalist Selby - chief editor of the journal that published his famous Sarawak paper - had prior read and cited the book containing what the world's leading experts (including both Darwin and Wallace) admit contains the complete first publication of the theory of macroevolution by natural selection.  You can read the independently verifiable facts (and more besides on Darwin) in these open access peer reviewed scholarly articles and my book:

1. http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf

2. http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

3. The method used to make these new discoveries: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66

4. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-greatest-secret/dp/1541343964

Disgusting Behaviour Facilitated by Wikipedia

Retweeted Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet):

Essay Mills (just like Wikipedia) serve as "...fences for stolen ideas, discoveries and other originality" @DrMarkGriffiths @LaxmiAggarwal1 See the disgusting behaviour... https://t.co/6Fe9xfPTE2

— BritSocCrim @ BCU 2018 (@BSCBCU_18) May 2, 2018

+
Mike Sutton This dreadful behaviour (including a campaign of numerous malicious and malevolent emails sent to my employer and other academics (and more besides) including leading light members of the BSC) followed the BSC's expert peer reviewed publication of deeply disturbing new facts unearthed in the historic publication record on science fraud by plagiarism and lies - using a new method - (1) The new facts uncovered: http://britsoccrim.org/volume14/pbcc_2014_sutton.pdf and (2) the method used to discover it (also expert peer reviewed in a scholalry journal) http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66
+

⚡️ “Stepping up to the plate” Stepping up to the plate +

Hahaha - what a pseudoscientific twerp that homeopath is. I get the same silly Billy daft nonsense daily from Darwin worshipers deeply disturbed by newly unearthed data. One of these #hatemongers was apparently sacked by #EdinburghUniversity for it https://t.co/mhqWdk8MIt

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 2, 2018

The Social Evolution of Plagiarism: Darwin's pigeons come home to roost

Well Charles Darwin has set the precedent for massive cheating by plagiarism. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL https://t.co/gZaK4Sn0KS

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 1, 2018

+

But it would help if Uni staff first admitted that cheating their way to the top by snakey plagiarism and glory thieving lies is unacceptable - even amongst the most beloved of academic heroes: #TimeToName&ShameCharlesDarwin ?
1. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL
2. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 2, 2018

+

Might I suggest we consider, @LaxmiAggarwal1 therefore, the Market Reduction Approach (#MRA) to plagiarism. It is an approach for tackling all kind of theft (nothing to do with MensRightsMovement by the way). Essay Mills are like fences for stolen ideashttps://t.co/DF4toKDZsx pic.twitter.com/3yNEBN4RPC

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 2, 2018

+
DISGUSTING ABUSIVE DEFAMATORY BEHAVIOUR ARCHIVED ON THE COMMENTS SECTION THE 'TIMES NEWSPAPER'S HIGHER EDUCATION' ("THES") BLOG SITE. THESE ABUSIVE AND HARASSING COMMENTS ARE POSTED THERE BY ONE PROLIFIC AND LONG SERVING WIKIPEDIA EDITOR OF WIKIPEDIA'S PATRICK MATTHEW PAGE AND THEIR MIKE SUTTON (CRIMINOLOGIST) PAGE. PERSISTENT AND PROLIFIC HARASSMENT FOLLOWS THE PUBLISHING OF SCHOLARLY JOURNAL EXPERT PEER REVIEWED PAPERS ON THE UNEARTHING OF DARWIN'S PLAGIARISM AND GLORY STEALING LIES http://archive.is/reG0s

THE WIKIPEDIA CULT PAGE ON THEIR REACTION TO THEIR OWN DETECTED PLAGIARISM

On the weirdo #cult of #Wikipedia. They even have a weird cultish page recording details of their fully evidenced wrongdoing. You can see the proof of its editorial sly plagiarism of some of my original discoveries, and ludicrous excuses for that behaviour https://t.co/BoI2rRegAi pic.twitter.com/zHmaCIePTU

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 24, 2018

+

#Wikipedia to be named and shamed for its corporate behaviour and the disgusting behaviour of its prolific and long term editors in forthcoming peer reviewed articles on plagiarism, cyberstalking obscene and vile abuse https://t.co/DBRwkWtJn0 pic.twitter.com/jLBYZzYfk6

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) May 2, 2018

Why Creationists and Muddle Headed Deranged and Conflicted Crypto-Christian Darwin Worshippers Despise Patrick Matthew

(q) Why don't pseudo scholar creationists mention Patrick Matthew the originator of natural selection (who via Loudon would have greatly influenced Blyth)? https://t.co/yegI19XfUn
(a) Because Matthew unlike Blyth, Darwin & co was a real atheist who mocked the notion of a creator pic.twitter.com/pf6efhiftt

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 1, 2018

Don't be misled by desperate neerdowell unemployable pseudo scholarly closet-Christian nutters: Get the independently verifiable facts - that are as proven as fossils do exist in the geological strata - from the historical publication record:  Here

http://patrickmatthew.com/Did%20Matthew%20believe%20in%20intelligent%20design%3F.html
+

Now for something completely different.

When a wheelbarrow offers some light relief:

https://t.co/8ANaUsCWZU

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) May 1, 2018

Getting the message across

COMEDIAN WANTED

They never believed America's "father" beloved Bill Cosby was a nasty rapist. But he is. It took a decade & a comedian to get message across.

They don't want to believe the beloved Charles Darwin - epitome of honesty - was a nasty lying plagiarist. But he was. pic.twitter.com/hmxgCIsX5v

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) April 29, 2018

On "Why scientists need to do more about research fraud" 
by Richard P Grant in the Guardian newspaper: 

•  "The scientific fraudster...  lied and cheated their way to a prestigious position..."
• "...they took resources that could have been used by someone else, someone who wasn’t a liar and a cheat."
• "And until there is a change in culture such that people are encouraged to say, “Guys, this isn’t right” – such as I might have been a decade ago – there will continue to be high-profile cases of seriously damaging scientific fraud.
• That’s not good for science, and it’s certainly not good for ordinary scientists."

As this expert peer reviewed science paper proves with independently verifiable data Charles Darwin was a liar and cheat and proven glory stealing plagiarist. Here. And Darwin was caught and proven a plagiarising science fraudster and serial liar with the hi-tech IDD mythbusting research method. See another expert peer reviewed paper on how it works and some examples of deeply entrenched natural science and social science myths that it recently busted Here .

Divide and Rule: Social Scientists Isolate the Selfish Gene

New peer reviewed paper explains how social scientists uniquely isolated the selfish gene using bombshell discovering Big Data IDD method https://t.co/Z9AVuv9vDF pic.twitter.com/k09Too3Rxu

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) April 27, 2018

+

Try telling that to a credulous pseudo scholarly Darwin or Dawkins Worshipper

1. https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI

2. https://t.co/qPsB49TRcE

3. https://t.co/2JaOaW4lag pic.twitter.com/hLNTHSW1yQ

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) April 27, 2018

DISGUSTING CYBERSTALKING BEHAVIOUR IS RATHER COMMON

This sort of disgusting thing is more common than people think. For example, I and several of my colleagues have been abused, stalked, harassed & threatened by malicious, malevolent obsessed cyberstalkers following what has been newly unearthed about Darwin's lies & plagiarism. https://t.co/IQDvEOjzCJ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 26, 2018

Independently verifiable facts in the historic publication record are facts and published proven lies are lies. Only an idiot or pathological liar can't tell one from another

Daft as a brush pseudo-scholar Darwin worshippers really don't like the newly discovered independently verifiable facts in my book because they puncture the myth-based premise (started as a self-serving proven lie by Darwin) that no naturalist read Matthew's breakthrough pre-1858 pic.twitter.com/2JNSnlvOPI

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 23, 2018

The independently verifiable disruptively disturbing New Data facts have just spread to Tanzania. Watch out now for the "Knowledge Contamination" across the globe.