Sound Tautology: Knowledge contamination is proof of concept

Discovery of New Data Challenges Darwin's Story of Immaculate Conception https://t.co/Si2NOFWmBM #Science via @niume_official

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 14, 2016

Miracle...Innit! 

@TakeThatDarwin Na that don't fit what they wrote... innit. Miracle man: https://t.co/cPweJHYQo7 bruv. pic.twitter.com/NwPxHhI4Ca

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 14, 2016

Darwin's Ghosts are Ghost Busted

Ghost Busted on Amazon https://t.co/awPnhTRUzr pic.twitter.com/UTbL4je0y9

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 14, 2016

Dr A. Wilson on "Matthew Denial"

Dr A. Wilson on the hot historical, social and natural science topic of "Matthew Denial": https://t.co/KXlWT18rDo pic.twitter.com/tIcsNcDdgi

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 14, 2016

Among many, here is just one possible reason for Matthew Denial Behaviour in the 19th century

Another possible reason for the "Matthew Denial" behaviour in the 19th century : https://t.co/q7tjnoGCLV pic.twitter.com/JtTsVHR500

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 14, 2016

1831 was as much a politically and socially unsettled year in the USA, as it was in Britain. In 1831 Nat Turner led a violent and bloody slave rebellion in the USA. In Britain, Nottingham castle was burned to the ground during the violent Reform Riots. 

Unlike in Britain, slavery in the USA appeared to be nowhere near abolition. The British Slavery Abolition Act outlawed slavery throughout most of the British Empire, except for territories controlled by the Hooker's paymaster, the rapacious East India Company, which continued with the abhorrent practice until as late as 1843.

Darwin's pals Joseph and William Hooker - and their pal John Lindley (who, it is newly discovered, cheated Matthew by fallaciously claiming another was first to import Giant redwoods into Britain), another employee of the East India Company -  had many reasons to suppress the facts about Matthew's discovery. Their vested interests in slavery could well be one of them. The same goes for Darwin's pal David Anstead, who rubbished Matthew in 1860, because Anstead too was employed by the loathsome and murderous East India Company as lecturer at its Military Seminary at Addiscombe, as well as Kings College London.

Curse the Future

pic.twitter.com/WR8z06Iegn

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 12, 2016

A Single Unified Voice? Just How Scientific is that Exactly?

What's very wrong with this picture @DrMarkGriffiths @royalsociety.
No wonder 'fact denial' https://t.co/nOpImotkf8 pic.twitter.com/DSUcmdUvJ5

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 12, 2016

Darwin Arrives in Hell

After 155 years delay, Darwin's train pulls into Bromley Station. He's arrived in Hell!: https://t.co/GIRRldc9vK pic.twitter.com/0SfKw4EEEy

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 12, 2016

Darwinists United v The Actual Facts

Darwinists United v Sutton Top Professor of Psychology offers diagnosis on who is irrational https://t.co/Drm19arP8C pic.twitter.com/jjIHrhYHMh

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 11, 2016

NEWS

Excellent choice. Outstanding! https://t.co/HIjCEmaTME

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 19, 2016

Belief has no place in scientific scholarship outside debunking beliefs

What do criminology, hate crime, debunking of myths & reactions to such debunking have in common? (A) = Gordon Allport

Think & Act on the Principle of "Nullius in Verba"!

Gordon Allport

Gordon Allport - a leading expert on bias and prejudice - studied what type of people are most likely to conform to evidence-led debunked beliefs. His research led to the conclusion that such conformity is evidence of a weak authoritarian personality, prone to unreflective obedience. See his work: The Nature of Prejudice   .

I have experienced exactly the same type of authoritarian instant knee-jerk rejection and - in addition - considered stubborn 'fact denial' blindsight behaviour from leading Darwinist scholars in the face of paradigm changing bombshell discoveries, which completely disprove their prior beliefs about the history of the conception of the principle of natural selection. See my article on the topic: Here.

Social Science informs Darwinists on something potentially very scary among their membership https://t.co/IXeSwA6nIR pic.twitter.com/7DyspT3hOo

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 11, 2016

GOTCHA!

GOTCHA! https://t.co/ICVRCeh01i

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 9, 2016

BELIEF IS THE ROOT OF DELUSION

"Extreme Skeptics" @TeessideSitP believe in absolutely NOTHING! Think & act on the principle of "Nullius in Verba"! pic.twitter.com/PpbaOFStpE

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) July 8, 2016