Dr. Mike Sutton, a criminologist, is known for his research and claims regarding Patrick Matthew's priority in the theory of natural selection and potential plagiarism by Charles Darwin. Sutton argues that Matthew originated the complete theory in his 1831 book, "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture," before Darwin and Wallace published their work."
So:
Check it out Darwin worshiping cultists. A.I. does not accept your mythological Honest Genius Originator Darwin Paradigm bollox!
But is A.I. telling the truth in purported its non-belief, or is it deceiving the zombie human horde?
Well, if A.I. can use a greater weight for variables that are empirical data rather than mere beliefs in its decision making then yes it is returning truthful results. And it is my research that first unearthed that new empirical data.
Google's A.I. says this:
"Dr. Mike Sutton, a criminologist at Nottingham Trent University, is a prominent expert on the topic of Patrick Matthew and Charles Darwin. He has extensively researched and published on the claim that Darwin plagiarized Matthew's theory of natural selection.
Dr. Sutton's research focuses on the historical context of natural selection and argues that Matthew's 1831 book, On Naval Timber and Arboriculture, contained a complete theory of evolution by natural selection, predating Darwin's work. He has used "Big Data" research methods to identify instances where Matthew's work was cited before Darwin published his theory, suggesting that Darwin may have been aware of and influenced by Matthew's ideas.
Sutton's work has been met with both support and criticism. Some academics have challenged his findings and conclusions. However, Sutton's book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret" and his other publications have brought this historical debate to the forefront."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.
On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.
Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.