Patrick Matthew: Originator, Immortal Great Thinker and Proven Influencer on Natural Selection: How does this data alter the probability Darwin and Wallace really did have dual virgin conceptions of a prior published theory?

Sunday, 20 September 2020

How does this data alter the probability Darwin and Wallace really did have dual virgin conceptions of a prior published theory?

The answer to the question that is title of this blog is that it changes it hugely. It is far more likely than not they plagiarised Patrick Matthew's prior published theory of evolution by natural selection.

1. On Knowledge contamination: http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

2. Nullius in Verba Darwin's greatest secret: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-greatest-secret/dp/1541343964

The correct scientific question to ask is:

How does this new data alter the probability Darwin and Wallace really did have dual virgin conceptions of a prior published theory?https://t.co/jXLyNhJXsf pic.twitter.com/dSleOmy6R5
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2020

No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam will be immediately deleted. Other comments warmly welcome.

On this blogsite you are free to write what you think in any way you wish to write it. However, please bear in mind it is a published public environment. Stalkers, Harassers and abusers who seek to hide behind pseudonyms may be exposed for who they actually are.

Anyone publishing threats, obscene comments or anything falling within the UK Anti-Harassment and the Obscene Communications Acts (which carry a maximum sentence of significant periods of imprisonment) should realize Google blogs capture the IP addresses of those who post comments. From there, it is a simple matter to know who you are, where you are commenting from, reveal your identity and inform the appropriate police services.