Nullius in Verba

Nice to see the IDD method from Sutton and Griffiths mentioned in a review from Spain on the newly unearthed data on Darwin and the influence of Patrick Matthew - the true orignaor of the theory of evolution by natural selection (beware of immitators) https://t.co/a4N9mvc6Ab pic.twitter.com/6yo46jqzyb

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 23, 2018

Independently verifiable newly unearthed facts trump unevidenced knowledge gap filling made-up claptrap evertime.

Once again, facts trump make believe - knowledge gap filling desperate - claptrap everytime. So much for orthodox biology and the history of discovery of facts in evolution and what is independently verifiable as true or false: https://t.co/yjnBYK6aji pic.twitter.com/V0Omt54yCl

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) August 22, 2018

Woo Woo Wallace the Anti Vaxxer co-plagiarist (with Darwin) and spiritualist fan

Let's put history straight on the anti-vax movement The co-plagiarist (see https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL …) and woo-woo ghostie beleiver friend of Charles Darwin - Alfred Russel Wallace - (still celebrated by the credulous) was a very famous anti vaxxer https://t.co/QP29JqXqTA … pic.twitter.com/ScZzeuVpiM

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 22, 2018

Lessons for nasty deluded little stalkers: No. 1 (in a big list)

Lessons for #cyberstalking trolls and other nasty abusive harassers such as Julian Derry

Academics such as Derry who harass and stalk others because they made and published important new discoveries will most likely be sacked by their university. Quite right too. Such disgusting behaviour by Derry is a disgrace.

Lessons for #cyberstalking trolls and other nasty abusive harassers:

1. Don't stalk, harass & abuse academics who discovered or are associated with the newly unearthed facts that pop your little bubble
2. Don't lie, you will be proven to be a nasty liarhttps://t.co/icMMOyZIgT pic.twitter.com/QC0S1Z7UfG

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 19, 2018

Get the facts on Derry's stalking and harassing barking mad rabid delusions and lies - all written by his very own timorous little hands:  http://patrickmatthew.com/Book%20Reviews.html

Nullius in Verba and the Darwin Supermyth

On the Darwin Supermyth: Say "Nullius in Verba" and take the Veracity Challenge by reading the newly unearthed facts: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/4hX1GvlRKu

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) August 15, 2018

On the Growing Acceptance of the New Discovery of Darwin's Plagiarism

On the growing accpetance of the new data that proves Charles Darwin committed plagirising, lying science fraud by glory theft @DrMarkGriffiths Thanks Mark: https://t.co/tw4Qj1RNqB

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 13, 2018

 The above article is here and archived here

What many may be outraged to learn is that Darwin blatantly lied in 1860, in a letter to the famous French naturalist, and then in the third edition of the Origin of Species, when he wrote that no other naturalist / no one whatsoever read Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published full theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Because Matthew had informed him in 1860 that the very opposite was true. Moreover, the newly discovered (by me) data reveals that – contrary to the “no one read Matthew" myth parroted by endless Darwin scholars since Darwin started it as a lie - seven naturists in fact cited Matthew’s (1831) book pre-1858 Darwin and Wallace.

There is much more. And before some frothing at the mouth barking mad Cult of Darwin troll jumps in to claim otherwise here I am not a creationist I am an atheist and I think evolution by natural selection is a brilliant theory. But it’s not Darwin’s – or Wallace’s - and all the independently verifiable new evidence suggests Darwin plagiarised pre-1858 it as well as proves absolutely that he was a blatant plagiarising liar by glory theft.

Knowledge improves with more knowledge. I found the hidden books that overturn the Darwin myth. Darwin used to be my hero too. But the newly discovered facts disabused me. 

Darwin Cult Cyberstalkers

Twitter and other Internet stalkers are total nut-job losers. One of mine got sacked from Edinburgh university for it. He is in the raving bonkers #DarwinCult - and harasses young women, female students and others associated with my work. Here: https://t.co/5htznSFyZZ

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) August 13, 2018

A really funny conspiracy theory to defuse the rusty ammunition used by fact denial pseudo-skeptics

Today I wrote this in reply to one of my email correspondents:

'Darwin was my hero too. It was when I realised that so many claims to originality of my heroes were completely debunked by irrefutable published evidence in the hidden record, newly detected with Big Data methods, (but in fact no longer can be so detected since Google was handed over to A.I. [ of course the publications exist - thankfully  we now know what they are but finding new ones with the method no longer works] see this peer reviewed academic paper on that subject http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66)  that I turned to my then hero Richard Dawkins in the certainty that orthodoxy was right and he certainly did coin the term and concept of the Selfish Gene and that Charles Darwin did coin the term and concept of  the natural process of selection. But I was dismayed and  double shocked to find my two rocks of Gibraltar were pile driven to gravel by the new found disconfirming irrefutable facts. I hope that such examples, might be of some use - when put with others - to show that the publication record is like the geological fossil record. What is in it exists. Analogously to organic fossils, words and terms are like fossils, they show us the evolution of ideas. The publication record reveals this evolution. Unless someone has faked historical books and manuscripts at a massive level and inserted them in libraries and bookshops all over the world that is. Now there is a very funny yet real daft-as-a-brush conspiracy theory to throw back at fact-denial pseudo-skeptics.' 

More rusty ammunition will be defused in Teesside @TeessideSitP in December by a "woo-disposal expert" : https://t.co/j84invmfPv https://t.co/8oleMueqzB

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 7, 2018

Heresy for Darwinite Fanatics

I’m actively working on 2 new books. Outgrowing God is Atheism for Teenagers. Second one (illustrated) is Atheism for Children. It still needs a title. Maybe OMG I think I’m an Atheist. Both will be seen by some as blasphemous. And as hate speech, simply for telling the truth.

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 28, 2018

-

I have a cover that is ideal for @RichardDawkins . Because he believes in the Judeo Christian Tradition he despises that humans can have an immaculate conception. Only he adopts the Dawinite Cult belief in dual miracle concept births of Darwin & Wallace: https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/CSLOLfizpF

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 29, 2018

Plagiarism in the Journal of the Linnean Society

One of the apparently totally obsessed with me cyberstalkers - this one is a German named Dagg who follows me all over the Internet writing silly, often factually wrong and otherwise illogical comments - blatantly plagiarized in the Linnean Journal a couple of months ago (by not citing my book - to which he earlier wrote a typical malicious Darwin worship cult Amazon book review)  my discovery that Selby (among other naturalists I originally unearthed) read and cited Matthew's book pre-1858. [Instead, Dagg used the Selby discovery with no citation of my prior original Big Data discovery of it  (Sutton 2014a , 2014b , 2015)  in the previously hidden literature]. I have been informed by senior academics that I could have his paper retracted on those grounds, but I won't stoop to that level. Because now I can write wherever I like that he (an obsessive critic of my published original discoveries) plagiarized me on the topic of Darwin and Wallace plagiarizing Matthew, and he did in the exact same journal where Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Matthew. Moreover, he did so in an article trying to refute any evidence that Darwin did commit plagiarism. How ironic is that? I prefer to let the publication record speak for itself. It's all history and is all very amusing. These facts speak volumes for the quality of the Journal of the Linnean Society, of course.

More on this topic of malicious cyberstalking and other unscholarly conduct (with all the clickable archived references to support these facts) on the Patrick Matthew website Here.

An earlier blog on this particular hilarious Linnean Society Journal debacle here