One of the apparently totally obsessed with me cyberstalkers - this one is a German named Dagg who follows me all over the Internet writing silly, often factually wrong and otherwise illogical comments - blatantly plagiarized in the Linnean Journal a couple of months ago (by not citing my book - to which he earlier wrote a typical malicious Darwin worship cult Amazon book review) my discovery that Selby (among other naturalists I originally unearthed) read and cited Matthew's book pre-1858. [
Instead, Dagg used the Selby discovery with no citation of my prior original Big Data discovery of it (Sutton 2014a , 2014b , 2015) in the previously hidden literature]. I have been informed by senior academics that I could have his paper retracted on those grounds, but I won't stoop to that level. Because now I can write wherever I like that he (an obsessive critic of my published original discoveries) plagiarized me on the topic of Darwin and Wallace plagiarizing Matthew, and he did in the exact same journal where Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Matthew. Moreover, he did so in an article trying to refute any evidence that Darwin did commit plagiarism. How ironic is that? I prefer to let the publication record speak for itself. It's all history and is all very amusing. These facts speak volumes for the quality of the Journal of the Linnean Society, of course.
More on this topic of malicious cyberstalking and other unscholarly conduct (with all the clickable archived references to support these facts) on the P
atrick Matthew website Here.
An earlier blog on this particular hilarious Linnean Society Journal debacle
here
