Joahochim L dagg - Research data plagiarist is a proven pseudo-scholar. Proven by his own words.

Here is the article by "Dagg the Plagiarist" that slyly plagiarizes Sutton's Selby cited Matthew discovery. It sidesteps all the main New Data findings to try to argue Darwin was not a plagiarist. Disgrace to science! @LinneanSociety should be ashamed: https://t.co/Q6Colo3Oz8 https://t.co/naTZm3oxah pic.twitter.com/hll7Pzcb85

— BentSociety @The Veracity Institute (@OnNavalTimber) February 14, 2020

The Selby (Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper journal Chief Editor and friend of Darwin's great friend Leonard Jenyns) cited Matthew's (1831) original theory of evolution by natural selection was not discovered first by Dagg, nor anyone else before Sutton uniquely unearthed it from the historic publication record with his BigData IDD method in 2013/14.

Sutton's Selby cited Matthew unique discovery was first published by Sutton in 2014 In the 500 page E-book Nullius in Verba (Thinker Media)   - "Dagg the Plagiarist" wrote a childishly jealous malicious pseudo-scholarly review of the 2017 book Nulius in Verba archived here and admits to reading Sutton's 2014 book here

In two peer reviewed academic articles Sutton's original research discovery of the Selby cited Matthew original finding was published here in 2014 and here in 2015

 Empirical data underpins proper science. And all data is of interest to science.

Here is the concrete empirical data scientific evidence of Joahochim Dagg's knowing malicious plagiarism of research data first unearthed by Dr Mike Sutton and published by Thinker Media in 2014, Vae Victus (2017) and Curtis Press (2022) and various peer reviewed academic articles in between and Dagg's clear pseudo scientific weird gloating refusal to admit such original and paradigm changing research findings plagiarism is wrong. Image below can be seen on Dagg's Twitter account archived,

Clearly Darwin Superfans (and Dagg is just one of many of them) cannot behave like proper academic scholars and scientists or historians of science - so mentally disturbed are they by the new empirical data that bursts their beloved paradigm based on the now completely debunked Darwin Supermyth. Theirs is a credulously unshakable blind belief and empirical fact denial "religious" worship of Charles Darwin. This explains their malicious anti-science behavior.

Patrick Matthew v Charles Darwin the plagiarist. By Mike Sutton. Serialized in the Scottish Sunday Express

 In 2022, Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory, By Mike Sutton, was serialized in the Scottish Sunday Express national newspaper.

The "New Darwin Data" unearthed by Dr Mike Sutton on the world's biggest science fraud by plagiary and lies is that important. National news for 5 weeks running. 

1. Sunday Express (Mar 2022) 

2. Sunday Express serialized 1 (13 Mar 2022)

3. Sunday Express serialized 2 (20 Mar 2022)

4. Sunday Express serialized 3 (27 Mar 2022)

5. Sunday Express serialized 4 (3 Apr 2022)

See the news page on the Patrick Matthew website news page for many more national news stories on Charles Darwin's science fraud by plagiary and associated serial lies.

The Scottish Forfarshire (now Angus) connection to Patrick Matthew and Darwin's Plagiarism of Matthew's Scottish Theory

The newly unearthed empirical data on the Darwin fraud by plagiarism and associated serial lies bring the history of science and science closer to understanding how the breakthrough in human understanding of evolution by natural selection was really made. 

The research into who did (contrary to the Darwin Supermyth that none see Sutton 2022) read Patrick Matthew's (1831) theory before Darwin and Wallace (1858 / 59) stole it and lied to call it their own reveals more about the three Scots - David Low, Robert Mudie and Patrick Matthew in the 1830's. My earlier blog on the topic has been updated HERE (archived Here) .

One possible interpretation (hypothesis only) of these new findings is that Matthew (1831) got the idea of his analogy between natural and artificial selection form reading the work of Mudie (1830) and that Mudie then read Matthew's (1831) analogy with regards to timber raised in nurseries v nature and added it into his 1832 book. However, a forthcoming chapter in an academic text book on science fraud by plagiary and research ethics, written by Mike Sutton and Mark Griffiths (forthcoming [in print] 2023), reveals something far more profound regarding another Scottish naturalist writing even earlier - who very clearly influenced Matthew earlier than Mudie's 1830 book could have.

Further research on my part reveals more about the importance of Robert Mudie and his likely prior influence on Patrick Matthew before Matthew wrote his 1831 book "On Naval Timber". My latest book "Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's Theory" covers some of Mudie's (1832) replication of Matthew's (1831) ideas in more depth. In the 1830 text that follows we see Mudie (1830) beginning to articulate the analogy between artificial and natural selection. The fact Mudie, Low and Matthew all lived in the county of Forfarshire (now Angus) in Scotland cannot go unremarked.  The evolution of Matthew's theory of the "natural process of selection" surely happened in this region of Scotland. The exact same region in which Darwin's geological mentor Charles Lyell had his great manor house, just a few miles away form Matthew's house. More research is needed into the possible social relationships between Low, Mudie and Matthew.

Another who used the exact trees grown in nature v those grown in nurseries analogy is Thomas Laycock. He published it the year after Matthew also, in 1832.  In 1835, BigData analysis of the literature reveals Laycock was apparently first to be second (F2B2) with Matthew's (1831) apparently original term/phrase  "mental or instinctive powers." See "Science Fraud (Sutton 2022)", the book, for the details of how Laycock was connected to Darwin and Wallace and their greatest influencers. The Scottish connection in that regard is most profound, once again!

THE BRITISH NATURALIST (Part I)  CHAPTER I  Mudie (1830)

INTRODUCTION 

It may be a trite observation but it is at the same time a true one that there is neither waste nor ruin in nature. When the productions of human art fall into decay they are gone and if the artist does not replace them by new formations the species is gone also but the works of nature are their own repairers and continuers and that which we are accustomed to look upon as destruction and putrefaction is a step in the progress of new being and life. This is the grand distinction between the productions of nature and those of art those in which the same power finds both the materials and the form and those in which the form is merely impressed upon previously existing materials. 

The substances in nature are in themselves endowed with faculties unseen and inscrutable by man in any thing but their results which produce all the varied forms of inorganic and organic being of which the solid earth the liquid sea and the fluid air are formed and by which they are inhabited. The fabrications of man are on the other hand in a state of commenced decay the instant that they are made and without the constant labour of repair and replacing they would perish altogether. The most extensive cities and the strongest fortifications after man abandons them to their fate fade and moulder away so that the people of after ages dispute not merely about the places where they were situated but about the very fact of their existence. It is true that when man takes any of nature's productions out of the place or circumstances for which nature has fitted them and supports them by artificial means they cannot continue to exist after those means are withdrawn any more than a roof can remain suspended in the air after the walls or parts that supported it are withdrawn or a cork will remain at the bottom of a basin of water after the weight that kept it from rising to the surface has been removed. If man will have artificial shelter and food he must keep in repair the house that he has built trim the garden he has planted and plough and sow the field from which he is to obtain his artificial crop but if he would content himself with that which is produced without importation and artificial culture no planting sowing or culture is necessary for whether it be in the warm regions or in the cold in the sheltered valley or upon the storm beaten hill in the close forest or upon the open down nature does her part without intermission or error and while the results are so many and so beautiful the causes are those qualities with which the fiat of the Almighty endowed the elements when it was his pleasure to speak the into existence.

Etc Etc

Darwin, Wallace and the Role of the Murderous, Corrupt East India Company in the World's Biggest Science Fraud by Lies and Plagiary

 My Book Science Fraud: Darwin's Plagiary of Patrick Matthew's Theory shows just some of the now known connections between employees of the notoriously corrupt and murderous East India Company and the world's biggest science fraud.

John Lindley, (archive of page on Lindley) by way of just example was closely connected to William Hooker and Hooker's son Joseph Hooker./ Both were Darwin's friends and botanical mentors.  Hooker, Joseph, was Darwin's best friend. William Hooker, who lived and worked with his bachelor son Joseph, was in the pay of the East India Company - as were many connected to this disgraceful episode in the history of science and the cover up of Matthew's right to be acknowledged as the originator of the theory Darwin and Wallace stole.

My blog on the Lindsay's active deliberate  role in thwarting Matthew's botanical fame as the first to import and propagate giant redwoods in the UK can be read here (archived here). Lindley and his social network crops up again and again in the story of Matthew and Darwin - as does the so called "Honourable" East India Company. 

I have just ordered a biography of Lindley. More to follow once I have read it.

The Patrick Matthew Song

 This song is to accompanied by violin. The Patrick Matthew Violin (made by a master violin maker) will be completed in 2023. Performances of the Scottish heritage instrument will be by leading soloists and by players at grass roots levels upwards.

"You Who Lie With Darwin"   

(AKA "The Patrick Matthew Song" 

In the tune of "Scots Wha Hae") 

 

 

You who lie with Darwin dead,

Who Alfred Wallace astray led,

Welcome to your muddled head, 

Theory thievery.

(Narration)

‘… if the first description was originally imperfect, & had been superseded by any better description, it would perhaps be better to omit all reference to it, for the sooner such an author’s name was buried in oblivion the better.’

(Charles Darwin 1849)

Yesterday's the day, not now the hour,

See the face of Darwin dour,

See approach old Linnean power,

Lies and plagiary.

(Narration)

‘This discovery recently published by Mr. Darwin turns out to be what I published very fully... as far back as January 1, 1831... reviewed in numerous periodicals, so as to have full publicity...by Loudon…and repeatedly in the United Service Magazine for 1831 etc.’

(Patrick Matthew 1860)

You are just a fraudster's knave!

You will fill a dullard's grave!

Nothing but a liar's slave!

Full of credulity.

(Narration)

‘I think that no one will feel surprised that neither I, nor apparently any other naturalist, had heard of Mr Matthew’s views…’

(Charles Darwin 1860a)

It's Patrick Matthew's Natural law,

Facts and empirical data draw,

Truth not Darwin's spin of yore!

Why not follow me?

(Narration)

‘I notice in your Number of April 21 Mr. Darwin’s letter honourably acknowledging my prior claim relative to the origin of species. I have not the least doubt that, in publishing his late work, he believed he was the first discoverer of this law of Nature. He is however wrong in thinking that no naturalist was aware of the previous discovery. I had occasion some 15 years ago to be conversing with a naturalist, a professor of a celebrated university, and he told me he had been reading my work “Naval Timber,” but that he could not bring such views before his class or uphold them publicly from fear of the cutty-stool, a sort of pillory punishment, not in the market-place and not devised for this offence, but generally practised a little more than half a century ago. It was at least in part this spirit of resistance to scientific doctrine that caused my work to be voted unfit for the public library of the fair city itself. The age was not ripe for such ideas, nor do I believe is the present one,..’

(Patrick Matthew 1860a, p.433)

Darwin lied and Darwin stole!

Alfred Wallace's same role!

BigData down their rabbit hole,

Found dysology!

(Narration)

‘…an obscure writer on Forest Trees, in 1830, in Scotland, most expressly & clearly anticipated my views — though he put the case so briefly, that no single person ever noticed the scattered passages in his book…’

(Charles Darwin 1861a) 

‘Unfortunately the view was given by Mr. Matthew very briefly in scattered passages in an Appendix to a work on a different subject, so that it remained unnoticed until Mr. Matthew himself drew attention to it in The Gardeners’ Chronicle, on April 7th,

1860.’(Charles Darwin, 1861, p.xv)

Lay the theory stealers low!

Myths fall, facts their foe!

Matthew's words in every blow!

It's Scotland's theory!!!

 

"...on what is termed Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection, but which theory was published by me about thirty years before Darwin (honourably acknowledged in his last edition by Darwin) at a time when man was scarcely ready for such thoughts, I surely had the best right to be heard upon this subject. Yet others were allowed to speak upon it, and its parent denied to do so. Such is the conduct of a Society terming itself the British Association for the Advancement of Science." 

Matthew (1867) the Dundee Advertiser . September 12. 

 

                  Arrangement and part composition by Mike Sutton January 14th 2023.

Archived. Here

See also the blues number "Darwin The Kidnapper" HERE

 

 Other great performances of Scots Wha Hae (the Stanza by Robert Burns)

 Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZiUHG2u4G0

Here https://youtu.be/WgskbClWZ68?t=1

Here https://youtu.be/o5kE3of1Lzo?t=2

Patrick Matthew: The Video on the Book on Darwin's Science Fraud

 Watch this short video on Charles's Darwin's Science Fraud by Plagiarism and Lies

The English Politics of the Suppression of the Scot Patrick Matthew

The English "Establishment" of Charles Darwin's landed gentry nasty pals played no small part in the suppression of the truth about who originated the theory Darwin stole. See the relevant facts on PatrickMatthew.Com : Here

The Patrick Matthew Violin

 In 2023 the Patrick Mathew Scottish heritage violin will be completed. 

This instrument is being made by a famous master violin maker, whose instruments are played by leading soloists and approved as "as good as my Petrus Guarneri" by Nigel Kennedy. 

The Patrick Matthew instrument has been specially commissioned by Dr Mike Sutton to celebrate the great Scottish Enlightenment science hero and original author of the theory Darwin and Wallace stole with the help of Darwin's powerful pals.  

Halloween 2022, when pressed by the journalist Sonia Poulton, Mike talks a little about this project for the very first time.

 In 2023 Scotland, and the world will be hearing a lot more from The Patrick Matthew violin.

The October 31 2022 news show clip of Mike talking with Sonia Poulton and Sean Ward about the notion of "haunted" violins and about the special commissioning of  The Patrick Matthew Scottish heritage violin is below.

The video of professional performance violinist Ursula Donnelley playing the "Haunted Tobin" violin is in the video below:

More about the Tobin Violin, which is for sale, here. 

The current "for sale" price of  The Tobin violin is here
 

Undeclared Commercial Conflict of Interest? Lunatic J F (Julian) Derry the Darwin Monkey Monger and Youth Hostel Toilets Cleaner

 If in any doubt that J F Derry is a psychopathic idiot in need of a padded cell and straight jacket for his own good click here to read his mad malicious and delusional obsessive childish idiocy. The poor deranged twerp. 

Julian Derry who, according to Linked-in, merely works as some kind of  youth hostel cleaner, appears to have a mental disorder that certainly involves a lot of complete weird projection of his own transparent inadequacies and malicious jealous behaviour onto others.  But when beloved old paradigms are overturned with new data we know such excellent yet shocking discoveries bring the sad and lonely nutters out of their mother's basements, and filthy little youth hostels, and onto the Internet. The "Fierce Resistance" stage in Kuhn's paradigm change cycle explains it (see Sutton 2022 for more examples and a deeper explanation).

Here we see a typical example (Derry [Archived] on Twitter), in the image directly below of no doubt his own visits to his own stalker blog site that he has retweeted from another of his Twitter account. Real academics and journalists - particularly criminologists and psychologists - will no doubt cite this kind of thing in future case studies of such poor deranged creatures.

Besides cleaning a youth hostel for a living, Dr Julian (J.F. ) Derry is the nasty anal rape tweeting harassing and obsessively jealous, malicious and obscene, criminal stalker nut job (here) who owns and runs and profits financially from the commercial "Darwin Monkey" https://archive.ph/xvGbL (see proof its him https://archive.ph/rxnZ6 )  business - selling Darwin Industry paraphernalia models / ornaments -  is publishing academic papers on Charles Darwin and so is surely (isn't he?) wrongly declaring no conflict of interest: e.g a most recent Royal Society paper  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32755351/

Surely that is against the rules? Isn't it? Surely he is then, on his own silly little stalker website, projecting his own academic misconduct onto others who have not committed any academic misconduct - other than using empirical data to upset jealous academic failure nut cases like Derry and others blindly facilitating the Darwin Supermyth in the deluded hope they can somehow magically bury the hateful newly unearthed empirical data evidenced facts that bust it.

Here is as good a definition of what constitutes a commercial conflict of interest when it comes to academic papers as any: 

"A conflict of interest is a financial, intellectual relationship, personally owned and operated commercial business, or other  circumstances, that might affect, or reasonably be perceived by others to affect, an author’s judgement, conduct, or manuscript. When in doubt, disclose."  More Here

Derry is criminally harassing Professor Mark Griffiths simply because Mark has supported the veracity of the new data that proves other naturalists did read (because it is newly found they cited it) Matthew's 1831 book containing the theory of evolution by natural selection before Darwin and Wallace replicated it. Deranged Derry criminally harasses anyone who does so. Here he is at it again. Totally insane obsessed, deluded nonsense as usual https://archive.ph/OLmSd He needs serious psychiatric help. Obviously. How long before this total obsessive stalker loon harms someone? 

How many other academic papers about Darwin, or at least once mentioning Darwin, has Julian Derry done his failure to disclose act on? The telling question is this: What would the journal editors do if they found out what he is up to? How can his articles be objective when he has an undeclared commercial business interest in selling Darwin ornaments that glorify Darwin? Should his Darwin superfan papers now be retracted? Some cases like this lead to exactly that outcome. See:  https://retractionwatch.com/2017/01/19/undisclosed-conflicts-often-lead-corrections-not-always/

Charles Darwin did not mislead Joseph Hooker in their 1881 Correspondence about Leopold von Buch and Karl Ernst von Baer | Dagg, Joachim L.; Derry, J. F. | download Charles Darwin did not mislead Joseph Hooker in their 1881 Correspondence about Leopold von Buch and Karl Ernst von Baer | Dagg, Joachim L.; Derry, J. F. | download | BookSC. Download books for free. Find books ur.art1lib.com

Jerry Coyne - AKA God's Own Pseudo Scholar for Jesus"

 (Q) "What kind of scholar writes a load of desperate delusional speculative disinformation conspiracy theory claptrap about a book they admit have never read?"

(A) "A pseudo-scholar."

Ladies and Gentlemen and everyone else. I give you the anti-intellectual dosser Jerry Coyne ha ha ha and his credulous bunch of dosser trolls: https://archive.ph/4qe6L . He even mistakes a witty satirical review of "Science Fraud as a serious review. What a total twit.😆 So typical of the Darwin Worship cult.