What happens when painful newly discovered facts upset members of the zombie horde of Darwin's credulous familiars?

 For the historical record I have proof that zombies really exist: https://archive.is/WxphK

Poor lost little demented chap. Maybe he was once a real person? Gollum, Gollum. 😎

Charles Darwin is a proven racist, serial lying science fraudster by plagiary and glory theft of a prior published theory

 No need to pull down the statues of the racist Darwin. Just put signs on them all and take a selfie.

Visit PatrickMatthew.com for all the facts on Darwin's science fraud by plagiary and lies. And his nasty racism. 

Historic Letter Found: About Patrick Matthew and written by his neighbour

 I am grateful to Fiona Ross of the Carse of Gowrie Sustainability Group for sending me this image of a letter typed by David Nicoll of the Parish Council Office, Errol in the Carse of Gowrie. Matthew is buried in Errol churchyard. The letter was found by Liz Roberston, after finding it in family papers. The letter is dated 1925, to a Mr Lang of St Andrews. This letter is also on the Patrick Matthew Website Here

Now that has set the cat among the pigeons again:

.

Trying to get to bottom of it Hugh. Calman, from his interview with Matthew's daughter has 1857. I've asked Peter Symon @petersymon who discovered Matthew's grave to help. If date was 1859 it suggests Matthew was in greater state of grief when he had to fight for his priority. pic.twitter.com/Au3om24sPa

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 10, 2021

So we now know Calman was wrong to write that Matthew's wife died in 1856.  In fact she died in 1859, the very year in which Darwin's Origin of Species was published and stole his (1831) prior published theory. 

Calman (1912) had it wrong - from his interview with one of Matthew's surviving daughters Euphemia Matthew. 

Thanks are due to Peter Symon, who supplied the above information at the time he discovered Matthew's long lost grave.

Given that David Nicoll's first account corresponds accurately with the burial records I think we should favour his first hand account that Matthew's wife's name was Agnes over Calman's second-hand interview transcription account that he name was Christian.

Reference

Calman, W. T. (1912a) Patrick Matthew of Gourdiehill, Naturalist. British Association, Dundee Meeting, 1912. Handbook. David Winter and Son. Dundee. pp. 451-457.

.

They tried to bury him in oblivion - like fact denial sucking vampires - Darwin and his mad familiars doing his plagiarizing science fraudster lying bidding from the grave. But facts have a habit of always burrowing to the top: https://t.co/HFOMu4u85Y pic.twitter.com/nQm3AWSKwC

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 10, 2021

Samuel Butler Wrote on Why He Knew What Charles Darwin Did

Samuel Butler - a family friend of Darwin - said he plagiarised Matthew! Visit PatrickMatthew.com for the facts on Butler and Darwin

Samuel Butler - bet most people today have never heard of him. He hated Victorian hypocrisy: https://t.co/AMcuVlWga9 pic.twitter.com/jWZFSMxM2H

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 7, 2021

Charles Darwin was a very naughty boy

 Visit the Patrick Matthew website patrickmatthew.com to find out the verifiable facts on Charles Darwin, Alfred Wallace, Patrick Matthew and others at the centre of a shocking story of the worlds greatest science fraud.

In the 19th Century, Robert Chambers published, anonymously, the heretical science book that influenced Darwin & Wallace. Namely, "The Vestiges Of Creation". But there is a massive hidden, shameful, secret in that story.

Darwin was a very naughty boy!https://t.co/UWWc1nPSuL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 8, 2021

Charles Darwin's Plagiarism Tree and the IDD Research Method

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Nullius-Verba-Darwins-greatest-secret/dp/1541343964

Drawing Back the Curtain: The True Story of  the Scot Behind Darwin

The BigData IDD method so confused Google that its RankBrain autonomous AI robot asked me if I am a robot. 

IDD On the Trail of the Darwin's World's Greatest Science Fraud by Plagiarism

 The IDD research method detected that Patrick Matthew (1831) was apparently first to go into published print with the term 'natural process of selection'. Years later Darwin was apparently first to four word shuffle that orignal term into 'process of natural selection' to name the exact same theory and then claim it as his own.

Darwin's four-word-shuffle is included nine times in the Origin of Species (1859) at pages 38, 104, 178, 179, 181, 203, 235, 279 and 280.

It's not a debate about what is has been discovered. It's about what that discovery has done to a myth

 Newly unearthed facts prove Patrick Matthew influenced Darwin's and Wallace's influencers and influenced their influencer's influencers.

Dishonest Darwin Fanatics are Responsible for Heritage Trees Being Under Threat in Scotland

 

By tugging their forelocks to English Darwin fanatics, the failure of enough Scottish people to know that their countryman Patrick Matthew was robbed by Darwin The Plagiarist have already demolished Matthew's country house out of such unforgivable ignorance. Now they are all set to lose these great heritage trees.  

The pseudo-scholarly Darwin Deification Cult now threatens major heritage tress in Scotland by fact denying the major importance of Patrick Matthew and Darwin's science fraud by plagiary @AlberroHeather @LaxmiAggarwal1 @HughDower @Grouse_Beater https://t.co/tKUxNrSgqp

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 22, 2021

 

Why do some universities shy away from the most painful verifiable facts?

 J.D Benal (1954) taken here from the 1969 (third edition) Pelican publication (pages 33-34):

‘In fact at all times the individual scientist has needed to work in close connection with three other groups of persons: his patrons, his colleagues and his public. The function of the patron, whether a wealthy individual, university, corporation, or a department of State, is to provide the money on which the scientist must live and which will enable him to carry on his work. The patron will in turn want to have something to say on what is actually done, especially if his ultimate object is commercial advantage or military success. It will apparently be less so only if he is operating from pure benevolence. Or in the pursuit of prestige or advertisement; then he will only want results to be sufficiently spectacular and not too disturbing.

In a Socialist society the function of the patron is taken over by the organs of popular government, at all levels, for the factory or farm laboratory to the academy institute, and is radically changed in the process. Because such a government can, and indeed necessarily must, take a long-term view….’

On which point, I have an email safely archived from the Press Office of my old university, Nottingham Trent University (NTU), informing me that a dean has insisted my prestigiously fully funded (by the UK National Lottery Heritage Fund) trip to disseminate my published and expert peer reviewed research findings on Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's theory remove any mention of NTU from a Scottish press release on the matter.

This is how disruptive new breakthroughs are supressed by the zombie horde of anti-academic vacuous - managerialist gimp - dullards.