We all know that Boris #SpafferJohnson is a many times proven #SerialLiar. Did you know that Charles #PlagiaristDarwin is also a proven serial liar? Don't just trust me, check out the independently expert peer reviewed verifiable evidence for yourself:
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 28, 2019
1. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/mfeC11jZ55
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Monday, 28 October 2019
Charles - The Plagiarist and Serial Liar - Darwin
Sunday, 27 October 2019
On the word alone of no one
Picture of me on the summit of Mt Everest at midnight.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 27, 2019
It's another case of simply "trust me" or "nullius in verba". You decide. pic.twitter.com/HnCWRN6vRU
Thursday, 24 October 2019
Liars please lazy people
Why on Earth is this plagiarist science fraudster serial blatant liar so celebrated by anyone anywhere at all? The answer is the same for why the serial liar Boris Johnson was made made UK Prime Minister and serial liar Donald Trump President of the USA
Same way Trump got elected. The answer is that people want to be lied to because they are too lazy to care about finding out the truth. It's easier for lazy people to be lied to. They take the path of least resistance.— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019
.
.Plagiarism of the work of others is not condemned at all by @UniofOxford. No surprise there then. The establishment celebrates glory stealing liars & plagiarists. No wonder then that serial liar Trump is president of the USA and Johnson UK Prime Minister. https://t.co/MqzvLFcpgB
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019
To add to that telling list, I don't respect Charles Darwin's and Alfred Wallace's claims to have discovered for themselves a prior published theory that their friends, Wallace's editor and their influencers & influencer's influencers prior read and cited https://t.co/4HW4hvof5S https://t.co/mDB5D3kd03
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 24, 2019
Sunday, 20 October 2019
Facts v Myths
Saturday, 12 October 2019
Magical thinking and credulous stupidity
According to ludicrous magical thinking of biologists & credulous historians of science, Charles Darwin & Alfred Wallace discovered a book, published in 1831, that plagiarized their discoveries, terminology & idiosyncratic explanatory examples, they published in 1855/58/59.🤣🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/NyrMvJasIQ
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 12, 2019
Sunday, 22 September 2019
Darwin, the Scientific "Establishment" and Antisemitism in Science
.Was Charles Darwin's newly unearthed with #BigData plagiarism of the prior published entire theory of macroevoltion by natural selection, which his & Wallace's friends, editor & their influencers read & prior cited, a necessary condition for the #Holocaust?https://t.co/H24sKXShxz pic.twitter.com/BxI6PF2xYP— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 22, 2019
Proper education is teaching up-to-date independently evidenced & multiple expert peer reviewed #Actuality, not training students to accept & regurgitate old illusions based on newly debunked claims & uncovered science fraud:
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 22, 2019
1. https://t.co/Nli3gCzRvO
2. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL https://t.co/Iq1WA9cz60 pic.twitter.com/f3nLkgI5eF
Friday, 20 September 2019
The Great Dog Bottom Swap Robbery by Plagiarism Explanatory Analogy
The Explanatory Analogy of the Great Dog's Bottom Swap explains why Darwin and Wallace needed to plagiarize Matthew in order to publish the Origin of Species and Wallace's Sarawak and Ternate papers.
.
.Am Explanatory #Analogy for #Plagiarism
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019
Darwin(1859) was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew's (1831) book as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem @BiologiaPensamt @HughDower @Grouse_Beater See--->> https://t.co/JVypGV613a
Some attribute the orignal poem to the Australian Henry Lawson (c1910).On plagiarism— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019
The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs
Here is my Amazon book review of The Great Dog Bottom Swap
.
.Dr. Sutton, iyo, would Matthews have written the same sorts of things as CRD in "Origin", supposing CRD had not "beaten him to it"?— The Beagler (@DarwinsWeasel) September 20, 2019
.(1) Looking at your question the right way around according to linear time, without Darwin having an 1840s (private essay) & 1859 virgin conception miracle of Matthew's 1831 prior published theory, his essential four words term for it "process of natural selection" which.... (2) https://t.co/5XJ0EaF0q8— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019
.(3) Darwin needed to rip off Matthew's original breakthrough concept and his original creative examples used to explain it. Analogously, Darwin was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem pic.twitter.com/ahiysdko0D— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019
Like unearthed & expert peer reviewed evidence of glory theft & associated cover-up lies following new #BigData research on Darwin's #ScienceFraud by plagiary of bombshell prior published theory?
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 22, 2019
1. https://t.co/LMpbVPMAh6
2. https://t.co/yZSRhuMq7p
3. https://t.co/7Vi9iiZdbI pic.twitter.com/u460i4hQNL
The Darwin and Wallace Virgins Meme
Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism included replicating many highly unique explanatory examples Matthew provided in his book - such as the difference between trees selected by nature in the wild and those raised by artificial selection, the camouflage, speed quickness and cunning of animals selected by nature, the very essential words "natural process of selection" (slyly shuffled by Darwin to "natural process of selection", Matthew's grassy bank analogy, and many others. In that regard they stole not only his orignal scientific theory but also his orignal creativity in explaining it.#Meme: Darwin's & Wallace's amazing dual independent virgin conceptions of Patrick Matthew's prior published theory - Miraculous because we newly know their naturalist friends & influences & Wallace's Sarawak paper editor prior read & prior cited it. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL https://t.co/QJIXWVCYhv pic.twitter.com/QQbz77pXfv— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 20, 2019
Stealing orignal ideas and creativity to get those ideas across, by not attributing their source, is the worst kind of plagiarism and fraud by glory theft of the work of another.
On plagiarism
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019
The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs
Tuesday, 17 September 2019
On Madison Grant, Giant Redwoods and the Eugenics Movement
By defrauding Matthew (an atheist who mocked God, the church and members of the aristocracy) Darwin made his discoveries acceptable to the Christian establishment that ran things in the 19th century Western world, by way of keeping God in his plagiarized version. Arguably, therefore, without Darwin's plagiarism and lies about Matthew the Holocaust would never have taken place. This is because Matthew's breakthroughs and all his essential explanatory examples, terminology and analogies of difference would have been effectively suppressed and so not plagiarized to be popularized by Darwin. You can find my earlier blog on that topic here.
Google "On Knowledge Contamination" to read my expert peer reviewed article on the newly unearthed facts of Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarizing fraud and supporting lies.
From the 1930's to its final end in the 1970's, the American Eugenics movement sterilized over 60,000 people in an attempt to take charge of its own evolution (facts here).Once again historical research reveals incredible connection between the 1831 scientific breakthrough of Patrick Matthew's theory of macroevolution by natural selection, saving California's giant redwoods from extinction, the Eugenics movement & Holocaust: https://t.co/EAAnqT0i07 pic.twitter.com/8wpaUgbmD8— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 17, 2019
Eugenics was based on Patrick Matthew's (1831) (plagiarized by Charles Darwin) breakthrough on evolution by natural selection. Interested in Eugenics and Nazism? Here is a fascinating drama film on the terrifying 1920's/1930's Eugenics movement in the USA: https://t.co/OEJ3UHLU2p— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 17, 2019
Newly Unearthed Reality versus Old Illusions
Strange times in UK & USA. We now live headed by moronic leaders spouting fake news & lies with apparent impunity.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 17, 2019
Even in the world of science our scientists cannot distinguish between newly unearthed actuality and their establishment's old illusions. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/KxE3N9Avz3