Google Trashed Darwin's Reputation with New facts About What he Really Was and how Credulous Many Scientists Really Are

Without Google, things would be so much nicer for dead Darwin and Wallace worshippers and for Richard Dawkins' worshipping fans https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/17/would-life-be-happier-without-google-i-spent-a-week-finding-out#comment-128141898 .

Just one example of how new independently verifiable bombshell facts that disrupt so called scientific "establishment" credulous beliefs influence the mere opinions of the general public to be incurious when the "establishment" refuses to face new facts https://t.co/K2QXOa8nvK pic.twitter.com/qqrrZtrtiK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 17, 2019

April Fools such as Stepen Jay Gould

The original meaning of 'April Fools' #AprilFools is a little different than how we see it today. Note also, it does not mention there being a day. Could it have gone on for a month, traditionally?

Found with the #IDD research Method [@DrMarkGriffiths]https://t.co/toQBT39ExD pic.twitter.com/SgwclbMch9

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 1, 2019

.

We can, traditionally, keep this up the month. But IDD research breakthrough [https://t.co/Nli3gCzRvO] revealing that once hidden fact would not be eligible for #Managerial💩idiot-REF entry https://t.co/toQBT39ExD

Interestingly, the book belonged to biologist Stephen Jay Gould pic.twitter.com/XPLmbrPSRN

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 1, 2019

Artificial selection and Charles Darwin

Artificially select them not to lie or commit fraud. Especially #ScienceFraud English #Toff #Darwin plagiarised original prior published conception of evolution by natural selection from Scottish naturalist Patrick Matthew
(1) https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL
(2) https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT pic.twitter.com/G1z8fyW3J3

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 31, 2019

.

Review of book "Nullius in Verba" written by a Scot who co-owned 3 priceless letters from English #toff Charles Darwin (plagiarist) to Patrick Matthew, Scottish regional Chartist leader, naturalist and originator of the theory Darwin stole, @80_mcswan 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿https://t.co/9R6EROkiGH d

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 31, 2019

The New Research Niche: Survival of the most fit, the most circumstance suited

The new research niche created by Big Data proves Darwin is not fit to be celebrated

Or one most circumstance suited to the ecological niche it finds itself in - for various reasons. Problem for Darwin is #BigData created a new niche in research that exposed his lies & science fraud by plagiarism. His long hidden fraud can't survive now https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/hEQQMRNtEA

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 31, 2019

Richard Dawkins - You have to be kidding.

Dawkins thinks we should be proud of Darwin. Why on Earth should we be proud of a plagiarizing. serial lying science fraudster by glory theft?

On #Brexit Shambles and evil consequence. A Darwin? You mean a plagiarizing, serial lying, glory thieving anti-chartist #Toff #Landed #fraudster? Proud of that? Proud to have the World's Greatest Science Fraudster by plagiarism and glory theft? https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/lMB4Zsg5ux

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 30, 2019

Toffs are harmful artificially selected parasites

Toffs such as Darwin had good reason to steal Matthew's original ideas, lie about him  and suppress his right to fame for his great scientific breakthrough. Why? Because he was a Chartist leader.

Artificial selection behaviour of Tory Toffs who have orchestrated #Brexit goes against C19th pre-EU recommendations of Chartist real originator of the theory of evolution by natural selection, who the landed Toff Darwin plagiarised then lied about: p369: https://t.co/G5HTAGbUUc pic.twitter.com/2uG0RqLPxi

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 25, 2019

Hypocrisy in the Scientific Establishement

The likes of the Linnean Society and Royal Society need to quit fact denying and giving the sly public schoolboy silent treatment to protect the reputation of the privately schooled and landed gentry plagiarist Charles Darwin. Their behaviour is hypocritical in light of the endemic problem of plagiarism in our universities.

Doesn't help when scientific "establishment" of the public schooled, other wealthy individuals & their toadies has for 160 years been blatantly covering up Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism of the libertarian seditious Chartist, Patrick Matthew's theory. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/NYo9gw3Wp1

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 20, 2019

The Establishment Run by Useless Public Schoolboys

Look at who has - and is to this day - seeking to bury the truth about the origination of the theory of evolution by natural selection by the seditious and heretical Chartist, Patrick Matthew. They are the overprivileged incompetent products of the British public school system and their lickspittle credulous toadies. Why? Because Matthew wrote against the likes of them. He saw them as a form of damaging artificial selection that prevents the best people in the UK from making their best contribution to society. We continue to see the damage this "idiot class" causes in Parliament to this day.

Public schools are part of an artificial selection in-breeding program that Matthew originator of the theory of natural selection identified as ruining the UK back in 1831. This enabled Darwin to steal his theory with the help of public schoolboys known as "the Establishment" pic.twitter.com/PHfxCZzr9X

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 18, 2019

More from Matthew (1831) here. But his book is run through with anti-upper class politics, linked to his theory of  what he coined 'The Natural Process of Selection." So named because it is natural, a process and involves selection in nature compared to artificial selection by human culture. That is surely why Darwin saw it as essential to steal the very same four words and to try to conceal his fraud by originally shuffling them to "process of natural selection." And that is why Darwin also saw it as necessary to steal Matthew's original analogy between artificial selection and natural selection in trees grow in nurseries versus those grown in nature.

Don't take my word for it. Get the independently verifiable facts, not the public schoolboy establishment nonsense. Get those peer reviewed verifiable facts HERE in a scientific journal as a good place to start.

Ahhh Coincidence!

Of course coincidences happen. I think the Dutch prime Minister's adoption of my prior Monty Python Black Knight analogy for the UK Prime Minister's Brexit deal is probably a coincidence. See tweet below:

Dutch PM compares May's deal to a limbless fighting knight
1. https://t.co/8wbbsK8BZs …
Is he one of my Dutch fan club? Coincidence or #KnowledgeContamination influence? Because I used same analogy much earlier on Twitter
2. https://t.co/qJV15IPYk6
3. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 18, 2019

 But what if the Dutch PM was to repeat many, many more of the original ideas in my tweets? What if his known influencers and their influencers were to cite my tweets? What if he was to take my original and prior published Market Reduction Approach and call it his own? What if he three-word shuffled my original name for it to 'Reduction, Market Approach"? Any reasonable person would then assume I have in some way (directly or indirectly) knowledge contaminating his brain with my own. Moreso, I'm told I have a Dutch fan club - via this comment reply to the latest review of my book Nullius.

"In my opinion, your review of Sutton's book is balanced and correct.
In our Dutch Sutton-fanclub we sometimes do not call him Mike Sutton but Mike Tyson, because he single handedly out-argued an army of neo-darwinists."

As opposed to a large number of mere multiple coincidences, I think on the weight of evidence that it is quite reasonable to argue that on the balance of reasonable probability that Matthew did indeed knowledge contaminate both Darwin and Wallace with his prior-published original theory of what he uniquely called the "natural process of selection" and Darwin originally called, by four words shuffling, the "process of natural selection". There are so many, many more original Matthewian replications by Darwin and Wallace, and by their proven influencers, who actually cited Matthew's (1831) book, On Naval Timber and Arboriculture years before Darwin or Wallace penned a word on the topic decades later, evidencing prior-influence on the brains of Darwin and Wallace. One who cited Matthew's book back in the 1830s was living in Holland and cited it in Dutch! It is all this newly unearthed data, found with the Big Data IDD method, that reveals these unwelcome, disruptive, facts. See my peer reviewed article, which reveals all with independently verifiable evidence form the historic publication record: http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/index.php/pl/czasopismo/46-fag-2015/921-fag-2015-art-05

.

What do I, the Dutch Prime Minister @markrutte. and Charles Darwin have in common (or not as the case may be)? https://t.co/7fiuVrZF8y pic.twitter.com/TeePfoYrR0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 18, 2019

.

#Fun #Humour #History & #Science. What do I, The Dutch Prime Minister and Charles ("#TheCopycatKing") Darwin all have in common? Or not, as the case may be. You decide on the basis of the independently verifiable facts weighed with reasonable probability: https://t.co/jWX1huuYey pic.twitter.com/bfF65tecdg

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 18, 2019

Propaganda in science

The untold tale of the woman who dug up ancient sea monsters https://t.co/ZItMqxzDmD

— Rachel Harding (@Silverwriter) March 17, 2019

.

Portrayed for her orignal discoveries as an idiot savant - the scientific establishment did the same thing to Patrick Matthew. Why? Because they are slyly - through propaganda - bigging up one of their own, who they want to look cleverer than the actual discoverer/ originator. pic.twitter.com/zoY3GMrubr

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 17, 2019