Digital Afterlife

The #DigitalAfterlife @philwane and re-discovered grave of #PatrickMatthew - The actual (as opposed to Darwin - the lying and plagiarizing science fraudster https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL ) 1831 originator of the the theory of evolution by natural selection: https://t.co/2DnSwbI0HO

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 9, 2018

Newly Unearthed Facts can Drive Vulnerable Neerdowells Obsessively Raving Bonkers. Slap a Nasty Jealous Little Cyberstalking Monkey Hard on the Head with the Law

Any nation's excellent universities engage with uncomfortable new verifiable discoveries / ideas to stand up for them & their discoverers. Unless they do so, human knowledge will atrophy & progress in many areas will be halted. Book burning may even follow https://t.co/CKTMM2Uttn pic.twitter.com/r0fIfPY7vD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2018

+

Wikipedia has a page on cyberstalking. https://t.co/AABt40p7b4 But of course, one thing it does not have on that page is that criminal cyberstalkers actually publish fake information on Wikipedia as part of their demented monkey offending. Thankfully, the law is clear & hits hard pic.twitter.com/k7gst5QZ42

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 8, 2018

+

Darwin is a proven liar and glory thieving plagiarist

#Darwin is a 100 percent proven liar. Put your hand over this text sample of his lies 100 times. Remove it. See his lies never ever disappear. Try it a million times. Same result. Billion times same result! See the shocking
independently verifiable facts: https://t.co/i3Hyac0KG4 pic.twitter.com/FZeNpP4Otn

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 6, 2018

On Giant Redwoods: Another Myth about Matthew is Busted

 

USA National Park Service has now rejected the myth that John Lindley's friends Lobb & Veich (closely associated with proven plagiarist Charles Darwin's inner circle) were first to import giant redwood to Britain
1. https://t.co/EjEcRBFXQN
2. The fraud: https://t.co/8xLE5AjUHD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 1, 2018

Although Darwin, who along with Wallace, claimed priority for Patrick Matthew's 1831 prior-published theory of evolution by natural selection and Darwin wrote in his own defence that Matthew was an obscure writer on forest trees, we now know that Darwin's friend and correspondent John Lindley published a fallacious story that Lobb, rather than Matthew and his son John were first to introduce giant redwoods into Britain. Moreover, the  journal of which Lindley was editor was in possession of a letter, penned by Patrick Matthew, proving the Matthew's priority for that. Giant redwood fame was for years  wrongly attributed to another, robbing patrick Matthew and his son John of their rightful glory on the topic of trees.  The consequences of Patrick Matthew not being hailed a hero, as Lobb and Lindley were in so many publications - between 1853 and 1866 -  particularly when the grand enormity of these trees was brought home to the British via a display of one at the Crystal Palace Exhibition in 1851 -  must have assisted Darwin later (from 1860 onward) in so successfully portraying him to other naturalists as merely an obscure Scottish writer on forest trees. And we know that the myth stuck. 

John Lindley is an interesting character in the story of Matthew, Darwin and Wallace. He was a professor of botany at the University of London and best friend of  William Hooker - who was the father of Darwin's best friend Joseph Hooker (who dishonestly countersigned Darwin's letter to the Gardener's Chronicle in 1860 that contained Darwin's proven lie that no naturalist had read Matthew's original ideas on natural selection before 1860). Lindley co-authored an encyclopedia with the naturalist and polymath John Loudon. In 1832, Loudon reviewed Matthew's book and wrote that it appeared to have something original to say on 'the origin of species'. That was 26 years before Darwin and Wallace replicated Matthew's theory and claimed it as their own unique independent conceptions. 

These facts are not a conspiracy theory as some today are writing to keep them down, because they are all independently verifiable . What they do represent is a great preponderance of newly unearthed evidence that the scientific community kept Matthew down by writing falsehoods and lies and attributing his unique and fundamental contributions to others. 

Get the verifiable New Data facts here

On Giant Redwoods

In Scotland some of these ancient historic trees are under threat of the chainsaw by developers:

Latests news on their history: https://t.co/EjEcRBFXQN

Support Scottish #RedwoodTrust https://t.co/M6FRlk4kiv
& Carse of Gowrie Group https://t.co/lsvYhZKW1f pic.twitter.com/ssFHAenBYV

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 3, 2018

Nullius in Verba

Nice to see the IDD method from Sutton and Griffiths mentioned in a review from Spain on the newly unearthed data on Darwin and the influence of Patrick Matthew - the true orignaor of the theory of evolution by natural selection (beware of immitators) https://t.co/a4N9mvc6Ab pic.twitter.com/6yo46jqzyb

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 23, 2018

Independently verifiable newly unearthed facts trump unevidenced knowledge gap filling made-up claptrap evertime.

Once again, facts trump make believe - knowledge gap filling desperate - claptrap everytime. So much for orthodox biology and the history of discovery of facts in evolution and what is independently verifiable as true or false: https://t.co/yjnBYK6aji pic.twitter.com/V0Omt54yCl

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) August 22, 2018

Woo Woo Wallace the Anti Vaxxer co-plagiarist (with Darwin) and spiritualist fan

Let's put history straight on the anti-vax movement The co-plagiarist (see https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL …) and woo-woo ghostie beleiver friend of Charles Darwin - Alfred Russel Wallace - (still celebrated by the credulous) was a very famous anti vaxxer https://t.co/QP29JqXqTA … pic.twitter.com/ScZzeuVpiM

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 22, 2018

Lessons for nasty deluded little stalkers: No. 1 (in a big list)

Lessons for #cyberstalking trolls and other nasty abusive harassers such as Julian Derry

Academics such as Derry who harass and stalk others because they made and published important new discoveries will most likely be sacked by their university. Quite right too. Such disgusting behaviour by Derry is a disgrace.

Lessons for #cyberstalking trolls and other nasty abusive harassers:

1. Don't stalk, harass & abuse academics who discovered or are associated with the newly unearthed facts that pop your little bubble
2. Don't lie, you will be proven to be a nasty liarhttps://t.co/icMMOyZIgT pic.twitter.com/QC0S1Z7UfG

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 19, 2018

Get the facts on Derry's stalking and harassing barking mad rabid delusions and lies - all written by his very own timorous little hands:  http://patrickmatthew.com/Book%20Reviews.html

Nullius in Verba and the Darwin Supermyth

On the Darwin Supermyth: Say "Nullius in Verba" and take the Veracity Challenge by reading the newly unearthed facts: https://t.co/Ts5EQd4J1m pic.twitter.com/4hX1GvlRKu

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) August 15, 2018

On the Growing Acceptance of the New Discovery of Darwin's Plagiarism

On the growing accpetance of the new data that proves Charles Darwin committed plagirising, lying science fraud by glory theft @DrMarkGriffiths Thanks Mark: https://t.co/tw4Qj1RNqB

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 13, 2018

 The above article is here and archived here

What many may be outraged to learn is that Darwin blatantly lied in 1860, in a letter to the famous French naturalist, and then in the third edition of the Origin of Species, when he wrote that no other naturalist / no one whatsoever read Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published full theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Because Matthew had informed him in 1860 that the very opposite was true. Moreover, the newly discovered (by me) data reveals that – contrary to the “no one read Matthew" myth parroted by endless Darwin scholars since Darwin started it as a lie - seven naturists in fact cited Matthew’s (1831) book pre-1858 Darwin and Wallace.

There is much more. And before some frothing at the mouth barking mad Cult of Darwin troll jumps in to claim otherwise here I am not a creationist I am an atheist and I think evolution by natural selection is a brilliant theory. But it’s not Darwin’s – or Wallace’s - and all the independently verifiable new evidence suggests Darwin plagiarised pre-1858 it as well as proves absolutely that he was a blatant plagiarising liar by glory theft.

Knowledge improves with more knowledge. I found the hidden books that overturn the Darwin myth. Darwin used to be my hero too. But the newly discovered facts disabused me.