Darwin Cult Cyberstalkers

Twitter and other Internet stalkers are total nut-job losers. One of mine got sacked from Edinburgh university for it. He is in the raving bonkers #DarwinCult - and harasses young women, female students and others associated with my work. Here: https://t.co/5htznSFyZZ

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) August 13, 2018

A really funny conspiracy theory to defuse the rusty ammunition used by fact denial pseudo-skeptics

Today I wrote this in reply to one of my email correspondents:

'Darwin was my hero too. It was when I realised that so many claims to originality of my heroes were completely debunked by irrefutable published evidence in the hidden record, newly detected with Big Data methods, (but in fact no longer can be so detected since Google was handed over to A.I. [ of course the publications exist - thankfully  we now know what they are but finding new ones with the method no longer works] see this peer reviewed academic paper on that subject http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/66)  that I turned to my then hero Richard Dawkins in the certainty that orthodoxy was right and he certainly did coin the term and concept of the Selfish Gene and that Charles Darwin did coin the term and concept of  the natural process of selection. But I was dismayed and  double shocked to find my two rocks of Gibraltar were pile driven to gravel by the new found disconfirming irrefutable facts. I hope that such examples, might be of some use - when put with others - to show that the publication record is like the geological fossil record. What is in it exists. Analogously to organic fossils, words and terms are like fossils, they show us the evolution of ideas. The publication record reveals this evolution. Unless someone has faked historical books and manuscripts at a massive level and inserted them in libraries and bookshops all over the world that is. Now there is a very funny yet real daft-as-a-brush conspiracy theory to throw back at fact-denial pseudo-skeptics.' 

More rusty ammunition will be defused in Teesside @TeessideSitP in December by a "woo-disposal expert" : https://t.co/j84invmfPv https://t.co/8oleMueqzB

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 7, 2018

Heresy for Darwinite Fanatics

I’m actively working on 2 new books. Outgrowing God is Atheism for Teenagers. Second one (illustrated) is Atheism for Children. It still needs a title. Maybe OMG I think I’m an Atheist. Both will be seen by some as blasphemous. And as hate speech, simply for telling the truth.

— Richard Dawkins (@RichardDawkins) July 28, 2018

-

I have a cover that is ideal for @RichardDawkins . Because he believes in the Judeo Christian Tradition he despises that humans can have an immaculate conception. Only he adopts the Dawinite Cult belief in dual miracle concept births of Darwin & Wallace: https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/CSLOLfizpF

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 29, 2018

Plagiarism in the Journal of the Linnean Society

One of the apparently totally obsessed with me cyberstalkers - this one is a German named Dagg who follows me all over the Internet writing silly, often factually wrong and otherwise illogical comments - blatantly plagiarized in the Linnean Journal a couple of months ago (by not citing my book - to which he earlier wrote a typical malicious Darwin worship cult Amazon book review)  my discovery that Selby (among other naturalists I originally unearthed) read and cited Matthew's book pre-1858. [Instead, Dagg used the Selby discovery with no citation of my prior original Big Data discovery of it  (Sutton 2014a , 2014b , 2015)  in the previously hidden literature]. I have been informed by senior academics that I could have his paper retracted on those grounds, but I won't stoop to that level. Because now I can write wherever I like that he (an obsessive critic of my published original discoveries) plagiarized me on the topic of Darwin and Wallace plagiarizing Matthew, and he did in the exact same journal where Darwin and Wallace plagiarised Matthew. Moreover, he did so in an article trying to refute any evidence that Darwin did commit plagiarism. How ironic is that? I prefer to let the publication record speak for itself. It's all history and is all very amusing. These facts speak volumes for the quality of the Journal of the Linnean Society, of course.

More on this topic of malicious cyberstalking and other unscholarly conduct (with all the clickable archived references to support these facts) on the Patrick Matthew website Here.

An earlier blog on this particular hilarious Linnean Society Journal debacle here

A Public Health Information Tweet On Skin Cancer and Donald Trump

According to the Independent newspaper Donald Trump's ludicrous appearance may be driving down visits to skin cancer-bed salons

This is a public information Tweet on skin cancer. Don't use a sunbed unless you wish to look like a giant racist, misogynistic "misspeaking" panda-eyed tangerine baby with a ludicrous comb across. https://t.co/vbGKyttp5E

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 21, 2018

Itchy Beard Day

Claim: "Darwin & Wallace had amazing dual independent conceptions of the prior published theory their friends, influencers and Wallace's editor had prior read and then cited."

Rational reply: "itchy beard!" It's #ItchyBeardDay

20th July is international Itchy Beard Day pic.twitter.com/FOKBNtF3o3

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) July 20, 2018

+

+

#ItchyBeard Where on Earth did this expression of skepticism originate? https://t.co/5dZVdoxFlY pic.twitter.com/OXwf1OQgFQ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 20, 2018

Darwin never lied he just "misspoke": Itchy Beard!

Perhaps, just like Hillary Clinton and now Donald Trump, Charles Darwin never lied at all now. Perhaps he only "misspoke" then? #Beard! https://t.co/BVl8R6w9Fk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 18, 2018

+

Misspoke? Misspoke?
Out comes the Clintonesque "I misspoke" nonsense yet again. Oh for heaven's sake. Clearly Trump is lying. He never accidentally said the wrong thing. He deliberately said the wrong thing. Why on Earth can't politicians tell the truth? https://t.co/OvRKJd8zgM

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 18, 2018

+

Facts are facts and lies are lies.

https://youtu.be/F-TA4GEHUV4?t=20

Don't be Like Trump and his Ignorant Followers: Say "Nullius in Verba"

 

Just as the plagiarist, extortionist, and teller of tall-tales, Alfred Wallace did in the 19th century, Donald Trump promotes an anti-vaccination agenda in the 21st. As our Health Watch article reveals, Trump's ill-reasoning is based on the infamous retracted Wakefield paper.

Darwin was a prolific plagiarist and he lied to cover up the fact he and Wallace committed the World's greatest science fraud by plagiary.

Remember Nullius in Verba #NulliusInVerba

Demand verifiable evidence you can check for yourself: https://t.co/yjnBYK6aji pic.twitter.com/pgMrzyHx3U

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) July 16, 2018

+

Remember @RichardDawkins & Darwin fans. Never rely alone upon the mere opinionated advice of any guru. Check the independently verifiable facts for yourself. Adopt the motto of the Royal Society: #NulliusInVerba They exist in books for your brain to weigh https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT https://t.co/m3VkfbWuLt

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 3, 2018

On Harassment of Academics

Read my Amazon book review of Ernst's SCAM here

Harassment of academics, and those associated with their disturbing original discoveries, @DrMarkGriffiths @EdzardErnst @lizmorrish @TeessideSitP @SidRodrigues @BiologiaPensamt is a weirdly unexplored area of #criminology and the sociology of science. More research needed. pic.twitter.com/RbQgpQ36JQ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 12, 2018

Who Do We Think We Are? Big Data N=All and Mentions in Parliament Cited in Hansard

Is is interesting to see that the same Big Data technology that for the first time (Sutton 2014, 2017) detected Patrick Matthew's (1831) book and bombshell theory of evolution by natural selection being cited in the historic literature by Darwin's and Wallace's influencers and also by their influencer's influencers (all many years before Darwin's and Wallace's 1858 Linnean Society Scandal supposedly miraculous immaculate independent conception replications of the same theory) enables me to see that my Market Reduction Approach to theft and my name have been mentioned in UK Parliamentary answers. Moreover, it is very good to see that a number of my co-authors down the years are similarly mentioned in Hansard. Who do we think we are?

HANSARD (UK PARLIAMENT) MENTIONS

1. My Market Reduction Approach (MRA) and me (Mike Sutton) twice Here. Also  named once here for UK Government contract award (Both main mentions for research archived in full here and here and named for Govt. contract award here)

2. Paul Ekblom: Once Here (archived in full here)

3. Mike Levi three times Here

4. Mark Griffiths ten times Here
+

On just one small part of our disciplinary legacy. So "Who do we think we are"? @DrMarkGriffiths @PaulEkblom1 Big Data and mentions in UK Parliament Hansard https://t.co/GcdmD6kYmy pic.twitter.com/3amaLzAUXz

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 7, 2018

+

So who do YOU think YOU are?

Who do you think you are: https://t.co/sFNkpM8MHm

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 7, 2018