Why Creationists and Muddle Headed Deranged and Conflicted Crypto-Christian Darwin Worshippers Despise Patrick Matthew

(q) Why don't pseudo scholar creationists mention Patrick Matthew the originator of natural selection (who via Loudon would have greatly influenced Blyth)? https://t.co/yegI19XfUn
(a) Because Matthew unlike Blyth, Darwin & co was a real atheist who mocked the notion of a creator pic.twitter.com/pf6efhiftt

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) May 1, 2018

Don't be misled by desperate neerdowell unemployable pseudo scholarly closet-Christian nutters: Get the independently verifiable facts - that are as proven as fossils do exist in the geological strata - from the historical publication record:  Here

http://patrickmatthew.com/Did%20Matthew%20believe%20in%20intelligent%20design%3F.html
+

Now for something completely different.

When a wheelbarrow offers some light relief:

https://t.co/8ANaUsCWZU

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) May 1, 2018

Getting the message across

COMEDIAN WANTED

They never believed America's "father" beloved Bill Cosby was a nasty rapist. But he is. It took a decade & a comedian to get message across.

They don't want to believe the beloved Charles Darwin - epitome of honesty - was a nasty lying plagiarist. But he was. pic.twitter.com/hmxgCIsX5v

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) April 29, 2018

On "Why scientists need to do more about research fraud" 
by Richard P Grant in the Guardian newspaper: 

•  "The scientific fraudster...  lied and cheated their way to a prestigious position..."
• "...they took resources that could have been used by someone else, someone who wasn’t a liar and a cheat."
• "And until there is a change in culture such that people are encouraged to say, “Guys, this isn’t right” – such as I might have been a decade ago – there will continue to be high-profile cases of seriously damaging scientific fraud.
• That’s not good for science, and it’s certainly not good for ordinary scientists."

As this expert peer reviewed science paper proves with independently verifiable data Charles Darwin was a liar and cheat and proven glory stealing plagiarist. Here. And Darwin was caught and proven a plagiarising science fraudster and serial liar with the hi-tech IDD mythbusting research method. See another expert peer reviewed paper on how it works and some examples of deeply entrenched natural science and social science myths that it recently busted Here .

Divide and Rule: Social Scientists Isolate the Selfish Gene

New peer reviewed paper explains how social scientists uniquely isolated the selfish gene using bombshell discovering Big Data IDD method https://t.co/Z9AVuv9vDF pic.twitter.com/k09Too3Rxu

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) April 27, 2018

+

Try telling that to a credulous pseudo scholarly Darwin or Dawkins Worshipper

1. https://t.co/6K7Wm5UvfI

2. https://t.co/qPsB49TRcE

3. https://t.co/2JaOaW4lag pic.twitter.com/hLNTHSW1yQ

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) April 27, 2018

DISGUSTING CYBERSTALKING BEHAVIOUR IS RATHER COMMON

This sort of disgusting thing is more common than people think. For example, I and several of my colleagues have been abused, stalked, harassed & threatened by malicious, malevolent obsessed cyberstalkers following what has been newly unearthed about Darwin's lies & plagiarism. https://t.co/IQDvEOjzCJ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 26, 2018

Independently verifiable facts in the historic publication record are facts and published proven lies are lies. Only an idiot or pathological liar can't tell one from another

Daft as a brush pseudo-scholar Darwin worshippers really don't like the newly discovered independently verifiable facts in my book because they puncture the myth-based premise (started as a self-serving proven lie by Darwin) that no naturalist read Matthew's breakthrough pre-1858 pic.twitter.com/2JNSnlvOPI

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 23, 2018

The independently verifiable disruptively disturbing New Data facts have just spread to Tanzania. Watch out now for the "Knowledge Contamination" across the globe.

Daylighthood

very nice idea, indeed.

— Simon Singh (@SLSingh) April 22, 2018

Darwin Industry real ale

Photography (c) Andy Sutton

No matter how many pints of this good beer one drinks, it cannot transmute a prior published theory into one of Darwin's origin. Moreover, following responsible drinking guidelines one would have to give the Darwin Industry a considerable amount of cash, brain and liver damage for it to change Darwin's many proven lies about the true originator of natural selection - Patrick Matthew - into the "truth" as perceived only by a deranged Darwin worshipper.

+

Following responsible drinking guidelines @AlcoResearchUK one should never drink so much of this excellent ale that resulting brain damage would change Darwin's many lies about the true originator of natural slection into deranged perceived "truth" https://t.co/QZrHPkhyRW pic.twitter.com/V0o4csLExb

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 20, 2018

+

See this paper Darwin worshippers.? https://t.co/Z9AVuv9vDF

Well, I am very sorry for you to have say that this is just the analogous intellectual bolo punch for your daft as a brush fact denial nonsense.

The sucker punch knockout is well on its way https://t.co/ID6nSzIXFJ

— Supermythbuster (@supermyths) April 20, 2018

1st of Four Articles Coming out on the IDD Method and Darwin's and Wallace's Newly Proven Plagiarizing Science Fraud by Glory Theft

Google searches uncover plagiarism and false accreditations at the heart of scientific community #news #academicnews #Science https://t.co/nvD9qFvHhr

— Holly Sutton (@Hollyonline) April 16, 2018

=

Prof Mark Griffiths & I just had peer reviewed article published.
Its official, the IDD method used to prove Darwin & Wallace plagiarised Matthew is a research "method". Proven too: Dawkins did not 1st coin the term or concept "Selfish Gene". More besides: https://t.co/waIQjoe3EE pic.twitter.com/POAk6l5277

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 16, 2018

=

The first of 4 articles is out on the IDD method and mythbusting (re the plagiarism by Darwin and wallace facts) @TeessideSitP More to follow...No 1: https://t.co/2JaOaW4lag

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) April 16, 2018

=

Milton Friedman always admitted - in the teeth of the false flattering claims he did - that he never coined the term "There's no such thing as a free lunch". Because there isn't. What about @RichardDawkins though https://t.co/2JaOaW4lag He never coined the term 'Selfish Gene' pic.twitter.com/DzvZcaot08

— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) April 17, 2018

Brian J Ford and his battle against fake news in science

Brian J Ford on Fake news.
He has written on that important topic before on Darwin, the man who - contrary to the Darinite myth - did not discover macroevolution by natural selection at all - see https://t.co/OW7uDgBIDe https://t.co/5x14jao0kC

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 14, 2018

On how to treat Dysology

On #Dysology

Some people, having found a rock to cling to for dear intellectual life, then eat their owns brains.

Watch out pseudo scholars we are coming to get you in expert peer reviewed literature. You are our monkeys in our circus now 🐵🙈🙉🙊🐒

https://t.co/eSnFXXhsR3

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 13, 2018