Fascinating thesis.. https://t.co/wgRJd4FDv5
— Tim Newburn (@TimNewburn) August 30, 2017
Please click the title above for the latest blog post
Wednesday, 30 August 2017
1000 hits inside 24 hours on Darwin's plagiaism
Guardian Review of A.N. Wilson's book: The Grassy Bank Job
CLICK HERE to read the Guardian article and comments on it
- 01I could add a wealth of examples of how many of Matthew's prior-published ideas, original terminology, and confirmatory evidence were replicated by Matthew from my book "Nullius in Verba: Darwin's greatest secret" but - given the grassy bank example used in the Guardian review above look at what the statistical geneticist Dr Mike Weale tells us about Professor Donald Forsdyke observations of Darwin's grassy bank text and its similarities to an evidentiary example provided by Patrick Matthew almost three decades earlier. In the text below (taken from the comments section of Weal's website "The Patrick Matthew Project" is addressed to me - Professor Forsdyke very kindly read my book and offered comments on it prior to its publication - NTA is an acronym for Matthew's 1831 book On Naval Timber and Arboriculture :"Mike, were you aware of the following interesting similarity between a famous passage of Darwin’s, and something that Matthew wrote in NTA? I thank Donald Forsdyke for pointing out the Matthew quote (see the end of his last video in his educational video series (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL59A9C65FB0DCED9E).The Darwin quote, from the last paragraph of “On the Origin of Species”, is: “It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.”The Matthew quote, from pp.229-30 of NTA, is: “Look at the broken mound, with its old picturesque trees and tangled bushes; there is the ancient root where the throstle had its nestlings, which are now at large on the leafy boughs, and are tuning their yet unformed notes to melody. Now every twig has raised its new column of foliage to the sun; and branch, and root, and stone, embellished all over in the richest variety of cryptogamic beauty, swarm of insect life.”The scene is used differently (to contemplate Nature’s laws by Darwin, to contrast beautiful Nature with boring manicured parks by Matthew), but the similarity of the picture is striking."
- 01It is clear to anyone with an understanding of it that A.N. Wilson confuses the simple ancient (linear) development hypothesis of evolution with far more complex theory of macroevolution by natural selection. Is it because he is a born-again creationist that Wilson makes no mention of Patrick Matthew, the true originator of the theory? Unlike Darwin, Patrick Matthew mocked "God" in his (1831) book, which contains the entire complex theory. Darwin, Wallace, Darwin's wife and the world’s leading evolutionary biologists (e.g. de Beer, Mayr and Dawkins) all wrote that Matthew was first into print in 1831 with the entire thing. Darwin wrote lies that none read Matthew's origination. Darwin wrote those lies after Matthew informed him that the opposite was true. The suppression of Matthew's first and foremost legacy is founded on credulous belief in those sly lies. If you want the independently verifiable facts about Darwin's lies and plagiarism (as unpalatable to creationists as to those in the cult of Darwin worship) simply Google "On Knowledge Contamination" to read my peer reviewed science article on the topic.
Society has a right to know what academics have been up to in their attempts to suppress facts about science fraud: https://t.co/GSy2LQq6i2 pic.twitter.com/jkmsgNAsah
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 30, 2017
Tuesday, 29 August 2017
Why Avoid the Matthew Problem?
— AdrianWoolfson (@AdrianWoolfson) August 29, 2017+
+Review @AdrianWoolfson @HughDower reveals A.N.Wilson can't grasp what natural selection is. Why not mention Matthew? https://t.co/gy1lFrB3dV pic.twitter.com/HwfOMhvllN— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 29, 2017
Like sending Giant Redwoods to the USA: Yes exactly that
Like "sending coal to Newcastle" Scotland in a Giant Redwoods to Nevada program:
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 29, 2017
1. https://t.co/2NuAGV5ZVD
2. https://t.co/JcxhOJtvjr pic.twitter.com/Rkjs9TZI0D
On A.N. Wilson and the actual facts
+Hugh Dower and Milton Wainwright have letters in the Times today on topic of A.N.Wilson's article on Darwin. Both berate Wilson's ignorance. pic.twitter.com/iTx2kLg7ga
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 29, 2017
Professor Milton Wainwright @M_Wainwright_UK @C_MAlexander @DrMarkGriffiths on record in the Times (London) today on Matthew and Darwin pic.twitter.com/EoOrEaf5Zr
— BlessedVirginDarwin (@OnNavalTimber) August 29, 2017
Grab the unwelcome facts
+Grab the sensationally unwelcome facts for under $10. AmazonDotCom offering a limited discount on Nullius in Verba: https://t.co/6tifVb7dRn pic.twitter.com/ynwtGJgxvl
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 29, 2017
Aye, Winter for claptrap is coming. And now the long buried facts are on the march. Unless Darwinists admit their truth they will perish. pic.twitter.com/cpoUJtKBsB
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 29, 2017
Monday, 28 August 2017
The Brute Censorship of Hugh Dower
Similar experiences confirmed by scientists: https://t.co/joE46b8rIC and I have more examples of such brute censorship of verifiable facts.
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 28, 2017
Pseudo Scholarly Fact-denial Darwin Worship and the Rise of the Right
My Amazon Review of The Rise of The Right via Devastating anti-intellectual impact of neoLiberalism on universities https://t.co/5oExBMX5Ub pic.twitter.com/dtDYSzrfBS
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 28, 2017
Darwin's Grandfather Erasmus:Like Charles was Also a Repeat Plagiarist
Because his grandfather another proven repeat plagiarist was a co-founder of the Royal Society he got away with it: https://t.co/dluk7aSwtz
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 28, 2017
Darwinians are akin to fact denying religious maniacs
When I gave factual lecture on Darwin & Matthew a member of the audience berated "How dare YOU call Darwin a liar! https://t.co/hzhlcZC1nL
— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 28, 2017